Search results

just look at the likes of Rob bell, or Brian Mclaren, who seek to make Christian relevant in the post modern age by making sure their theologies reflect moving to heresy

We all agree on the Essentials of the faith

Calvinism ceased being the primary Baptist theology gradually, becoming less dominant in the mid-1800s as more moderate or Arminian views spread, and then largely declining in popularity within some denominations like the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) through the mid-20th century until a...

All conservative Christians would agree that the sacred scriptures themselves are our final and supreme authority in regards to all doctrines and practices

The actual truth on this would be that those same Baptists that you are saying have defective theology are merely coming to the very same conclusions in their theology regarding what the bible teaches to us as those who assembled together and gave to us Confessions and creeds of the faith, so...

We hold that we are being led and taught by the Holy Spirit, but we are not inventing any new novel theology, as we are just following what has been seen as orthodox in Church for a very long time

This would be the standard biblical and Christian understanding, not Calvinist only , but Christian in general https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-became-sin.html

No Calvinist rejects any of the 5 Doctrines of grace

I just find it so funny that others think that Calvin and others just basically ignored the scriptures and developed entire theology from :man made doctrines traditions and philosphy"

We are not redefing what the bible teaches, but now defining it as was originally taught

The Psa view of the Atonement has been the definite viewpoint since the Reformation among both calvinist and arminian christians, and I do not know what "large group of Baptists" are denying that truth

Problem is Prevenient grace theology is a john wesley model, but not found in the scriptures

Does not mean though that good works have ANY part in getting us Justified, as they FOLLOW once been justified

No, but if they choose to do that, its acceptable

he did not hold to inspiration.inerrancy so would not see him that conservative, but he was still much better then what came out from the critical theology from Germany as fruit of higher criticism

if we do not inherit faith in ourselves while lost in our sin natures, then MUST be given to us by the Holy Spirit

The irony on this is that Psa is NOT Calvinistic version of Atonement, as Again, the the majority view among Fundamentalist and Evangelicals regardless if one hold to Calvinism or not , as its reformed, Baptists and Evangelicals

The basis is His shed blood which appeases/satisfies the divine wrath of a Holy God towards us while we were yet sinners

To bear our sins means that he will experience what ever lost sinner will in judgement, the very wrath fair those sins at hand of a Holy God

Those would be such as NT Wright and His gang, who denied the precious truth of Pauline Justification for some manmade notions concerning Pauline Justification, as they seek to undo the Reformation and substitute their own vain theology