Search results

I am still trying to figure out on what basis KJVO keeps denying as valid Kjv version the NKJV, Kjv2021, MVB etc?

refers ONLY to the inspired originals, not towards any translation

Since the reformation time, and indeed way before that time, conservative Christians have held to the Psa atonement view as the primary one, and required reading should be for all the Cross of Christ, By John Stott

Excellent point here, as the PSA view of the atonement is the view endorsed and help by conservative Cals and Non Cals alike, as in that doctrine a spurgeon and a Wesley, a Sproul and a Ryrie, a Tozier and a Hodge can find full agreement

The death of God in human flesh as the payment required to appease the very wrath of Holy God towards lost sinners, who tasted for us physical death and separation from the Father is superficial?

Not its all to do with God, not us, as the father has stored up for all sinners a cup of wrath and judgement, and he can ONLY declare us to be right with him due to either us or someone in our stead take from Him that wrath and condemnation and have it satisfied/paid in full. We can do nothing...

All Baptist churches pretty much have their own statement of beliefs, and also think even the SBC, while not into 1689 Confession, does have a srt of Confession of faith at national level

The Baptist Church that I am a member of and attend would be non Calvinist, but in the major doctrines and issues would agree, and allow for one as Baptist to hold to a differing view on certain doctrines

The Creeds and Confessions would be detailing to us what Christians on the whole see the bible as meaning to us

We can and should learn form the gifted expositors and teachers from past and present, as the Holy Spirit did send them as gifts to the churches to teach to us better the doctrines and applications of the bible . They are not Calvinists, but I have learned form those such as a wiersbe, Ryrie...

Very similar to when Charismatics claim the the scripture has Logos and Rheuma meanings

Which would once again having those into KJVO assigning to the 1611 translators exactly same inspiration afforded to them in translation efforts as Apostles had when penning down their original books

Its functions in English pretty much same way for them that the Hebrew and Greek lexicons for us would

True, but if they wish to keep using the Kjv, that Webster dictionary would be an essential study tool for them to be using

The Psa atonement view gives the most glory to the Trinity then any other explanation, a sit totally glorified them

Either God intended that the Cross was where Jesus died to provide a particular atonement and salvation, and that will be a definite group coming to Jesus, or else he intended to save all sinners by it, and waits upon our response, hoping some will make the "right decision" to now get saved

No, but we still have today the books written by mighty men of ther past, rich in doctrines and applications, unless we would say that we can learn nothing from likes of a Spurgeon, Sproul, macArthur and their like?

This is what happens when certain people make even the Kjv an idol

What satisfied and paid for the satisfaction of God towards His wrath towards us as sinners? A transaction happened at Calavry, as in that Cross Jesus was imputed to receive from the father what we were to get as sinners, and due to Him atoning for those sins, we are able to get imputed his...

We are to see the Bible as the supreme and only inspred authority for all doctrines, but still can use other bible tools for profit