Search results

Would the saved jews and Gentiles be part of the same Body, and both in the New Jerusalem then ?

Would you the Church as being "Spiritual Israel?"

If he wants to use the ole those of us with higher education can really see what genesis meant, that would be a fatal flaw, as the way he chose to describe Jesus being ignorant of what happened would show to us that he had a dim view on inspiration and on the Person and nature of Jesus

Do you accept that Jesus was and is God in Human flesh, and as the Creator, so he would have had firsthand knowledge of what actually happened, as he was there int he beginning

Roman Catholic Church proper was not existing until the Papacy The papacy arose as a distinct institution in the late Roman Empire, around the 4th and 5th centuries AD

Should we trust what God Incarnated said about Genesis account, or liberal critical scholars?

there are also many Calvinist Baptists, who would accept doctrines of grace of the reformed, but still holding to a more Dispy eschatology regarding isrel and Church, like a John MacArthur

The highest authority to we Baptists would be the sacred scriptures, and that would be the canonized 66 given by inspiration of the Holy Spirit

Rome did not exist until the Papacy

Jesus and the Apostles saw genesis as an historical and literal account of Creation, but you seem to hold liberal critical views in higher regard

Do you accept the witness of liberal and critical so called scholars over that of the Lord Jesus Himself?

God ordered the Jews to wage war in order to clear out of the Promise Land to them the pagans and heathens

Killing soldiers in a war would be acceptable, but just killing all civilians period would not be

Think trying to stop Hitler bringing a Holocausts to all nations under his regime would qualify as a "just war"

Like what Van?

Everything that happens to us as children of God must pass thru God first, as he either caused it or allowed it

Last Apostle who died was John no successors

No, i know that passage is from an inspired book from God, but the viewpoints given to us in that book would be as seen from the reasoning of the unsaved

And yet do not the Kjvo themselves points towards either the 1873 Cambridge Kjv text, or 1894 H. A. Scrivener's text Kjv as now being that perfect Kjv?

Actually refers to the entire "salvation package" from God to us being his grace towards we who got saved