Search results

Those who prefer the TR greek text and "Kjv family", how do you view translations made off the Critical Greek text? Are still word of God but inferrior, Good, or just plainly not even to be read and used?

Would you consider churches such as Methodist, Evangelical free, Presbyterian etc as also real NT Churches then?

Would that doctrine qualify as being a Baptist essential then?

If that group, staunch KJVO, actually took it upon themselves to revise and update the Kjv to reflect modern grammar and English usage, would KJVO accept it as being a legit kjv then?

Woudl it be no, or would it be based upon if its just self defense being healthy, or into eastern religion and philosophies?

Textus Receptus Only?

Many Baptist churches have requirements of be saved, no active sinning issues, water baptism, be a member yet Bible states palinly only requirements are be saved, and be not living in known unconfessed sinning

Seems that most who advocate "free grace" theology are non Cals, while Cals affirm Lordship theology

That would especially towards KJVO

Or as Peter stated to us, make your election and calling sure

Would that be a common view in some Free Grace churches. a focusing on what "we can do?"

Which supports the notion that KJVO folks must have either direct inspiration from the Holy Spirit unto the 1611 translators, or else derive d inspiration from their textual sources used by them

The Niv /nas/Esv/Nlkv were all just as "inspired" as the 1611 Kjv was

Very Important info on this by same Mark ward https://sharperiron.org/filing/43642 Gist of his interaction with Kjv only pastors was that only a minority of even them could correct understand the Kjv and what it was really teaching and saying, and if they were having big issues, what about the...

Agreed, just think that we need to present to them a realistic view of how coming to Jesus will save them, will be giving them new lives, but also does not mean now walking on water all the time and way into heaven

based upon that, he would have no doubt praised also the NKJV

Could be that the New Covenant is that Covenant enlarged and expanded to include now both Jews and Gentiles in it

So in the ultimate sense, the Godhead themselves placed Jesus upon that Cross for His glory and for our salvation?

Woudl not say heretical, but would say they are against the clear teaching of Scripture regarding Male headship and leadership

Agreed, yet think better way to view this would be proper Free Grace understanding deals with being justified, while proper Lordship deals with now saved and now getting sanctified