Search results

Only the original books were inspired by the Holy Spirit as being inerrant and perfect when penned down

I traveled from classic arminiasm AOG, to strict Dispy premil pretrib, to now reformed Baptist eschatology, of more akin to Historical premil. I let go of staunch pretrib view, but still find premil as the seconding return best escatologial outlook so far

Full blown heretical view or the partial one?

Good points, and also that many radio and tv pastors and preachers that taught on the bible well were fellow Baptist, as grew up even while not yet saved listening to them on TV and radio

Those holding to free will gospel accuse us of misreading texts to fit our theology, yet how can they read this and still see free will in there?

I am still trying to figure out on what basis KJVO keeps denying as valid Kjv version the NKJV, Kjv2021, MVB etc?

refers ONLY to the inspired originals, not towards any translation

Since the reformation time, and indeed way before that time, conservative Christians have held to the Psa atonement view as the primary one, and required reading should be for all the Cross of Christ, By John Stott

Excellent point here, as the PSA view of the atonement is the view endorsed and help by conservative Cals and Non Cals alike, as in that doctrine a spurgeon and a Wesley, a Sproul and a Ryrie, a Tozier and a Hodge can find full agreement

The death of God in human flesh as the payment required to appease the very wrath of Holy God towards lost sinners, who tasted for us physical death and separation from the Father is superficial?

Not its all to do with God, not us, as the father has stored up for all sinners a cup of wrath and judgement, and he can ONLY declare us to be right with him due to either us or someone in our stead take from Him that wrath and condemnation and have it satisfied/paid in full. We can do nothing...

All Baptist churches pretty much have their own statement of beliefs, and also think even the SBC, while not into 1689 Confession, does have a srt of Confession of faith at national level

The Baptist Church that I am a member of and attend would be non Calvinist, but in the major doctrines and issues would agree, and allow for one as Baptist to hold to a differing view on certain doctrines

The Creeds and Confessions would be detailing to us what Christians on the whole see the bible as meaning to us

We can and should learn form the gifted expositors and teachers from past and present, as the Holy Spirit did send them as gifts to the churches to teach to us better the doctrines and applications of the bible . They are not Calvinists, but I have learned form those such as a wiersbe, Ryrie...

Very similar to when Charismatics claim the the scripture has Logos and Rheuma meanings

Which would once again having those into KJVO assigning to the 1611 translators exactly same inspiration afforded to them in translation efforts as Apostles had when penning down their original books

Its functions in English pretty much same way for them that the Hebrew and Greek lexicons for us would

True, but if they wish to keep using the Kjv, that Webster dictionary would be an essential study tool for them to be using

The Psa atonement view gives the most glory to the Trinity then any other explanation, a sit totally glorified them