Search results

He instead has chosen out for Himself a peculiar people, and thru the atoning death of His Son Jesus provided and secured a real salvation for them

Speaking to the known Earth of their time, not to missionaries who would centuries later be taking the gospel into darkest Africa or into Muslim nations now

Lost sinners have free will remaining to reject, but do they have any to choose Jesus as Lord and Savior?

Actually taken out from the Bible authors themselves

There have been big improvements in Lexicons and Greek and Hebrew reference works and tools since 1611, in knowledge of history and culture, and the scholars on the Esv/Nas/Esv?Niv translation teams fully as capably as any o nt he 1611 team

Correct

The Translators of the Nkjv and modern versions had many more sources and texts to use, advancement in Lexicons and tools, and were just as smart in original languages though

even the CT and TR text agree 90 % of the time between them

Can we assume that God intended to save all lost sinners by the Cross of Christ, or did He intended to save those whom Jesus died for in stead of?

So you do accept non tr greek texts then?

So how did a perfect translation get made off imperfect source texts?

Pretierism?

Spiritual Israel

"We all have it coming kid"

The original to me seemed like James Bond in the wild west

Searchers very influential movie as Lucas, Spielberg, Lean, etc all looked at that and used it in their movies

KJVO keeps on spreading gossip and false rumors concerning the CT and those who used them in translation, and again, the NKJV scholars used the same textual source as the 1611 Kjv team did, and they altered and revised based upon the context, grammar, and modern English use of terms and phrases...

Except even that revision has known errors in its translation And why per KJVO was not the 1611 kjv already the perfect edition?

But the Rheimns based upon a Critical latin text being used, NOT the ole TR, so would be "corrupt" in KJVO eyes

Point is that the 1611 team did use for some of their renderings intoi the 1611 kjv those used in a Catholic edition based upon not the TR but a critical Latin text, as well as the Catholic Vulgate, so based upon how KJVO views Modern versions using the CT, the 1611 Kjv would be just as guilty...