Search results

Gail Riplinger asserted that Miles Coverdale “was intimately involved in the process of the Bible’s being ’given’ (2 Tim. 3:16) and ’purified’ (Ps. 12:6, 7) in English” (Hazardous Materials, p. 1165). Gail Riplinger maintained that “God entrusted Wycliffe and Coverdale with the transmission of...

KJV defender David Sorenson identified the 1535 Coverdale’s Bible as “a hybrid translation” (Faithful Word, p. 102) [bold type added]. Orlaith O’Sullivan maintained that Coverdale’s “1535 Bible relies heavily on [George] Joye’s earlier translations” of the books of Psalms, “Isaiah, Jeremiah...

KJV defender B=AZX3IczX26Ewem70SmHJ5yRwhnOFFZ58MzdiUJYkryEoeBViEAM3mJnPE1dri4LzQa_WLZkllBqUlCN9py44RK1u4SLXDLlXtL7N4VXbna9-j9aBc2__j5nNGqNIXR6qkaTLCNc67QKsFNNiP_F2Rc8iVwHB97Y4m--wkc_Cv60E4ahxsb4-YOaSU2io5XMAZ7UsC3KAXOrU__CbNngma4-t&__tn__=-UC%2CP-R']ryan Ross wrote: "This is a critical warning...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/wikipedia-donations-go-toward-paying-liberal-activists-to-rewrite-articles/ar-AA1QroVA?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6917af1128cf4a73a5cded50a4a4a1a8&ei=21...

Mike Holloway claimed: “If a Bible has but one mistake in it, it cannot be the Bible” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, p. 110). Mike Holloway asserted: “If a Bible contains a single error, it is not a Bible and should be discarded forever” (p. 97).

Mike Holloway wrote: “The KJV is God’s divine seed, because it is the Word of God. It is not a tool of the Holy Spirit; it is the Holy Spirit in printed form” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, pp. 122-123). It is clear that Mike Holloway claimed that "it [the KJV] is the Holy Spirit in...

You fail to demonstrate that I do not understand the word of God and how precise it is. Are you suggesting that you agree with Mike Holloway's assertions? The same word can be used with different meanings such as Word referring to the Lord Jesus Christ and word referring to Scripture. The...

After quoting John 6:63, Mike Holloway wrote: “The Word of God, the Bible, is alive because God’s Word is also the Holy Spirit” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, p. 122). Mike Holloway wrote: “The KJV is God’s divine seed, because it is the Word of God. It is not a tool of the Holy Spirit...

In the following quotations, the Greek words printed in Greek letters have been transliterated to English letters. Concerning the KJV’s rendering “great things” at Luke 1:49, KJV defender Laurence Vance asserted: “The AV reading ultimately goes back to the CT [Critical Text] reading of magna”...

KJV defender Edward F. Hills suggested that there appears “in Erasmus a humanistic tendency to treat the New Testament text like the text of any other book” (Believing Bible Study, p. 203). Jan Krans asserted: “With all the evidence presented here, we conclude that Erasmus understands and...

KJV-only advocates suggest that the ways of God are to turn over his testimony to one exclusive translation committee of biased, doctrinally-unsound Church of England critics who decided to add another English translation to a list of multiple earlier English Bible translations. Do the ways of...

Your question was answered. Are you the one trying to make this about me and others who think differently than you? You seem to be guilty of what you accuse others. You avoid answering questions that you are asked. You do not practice what you preach concerning the fear of God. You avoid...

How do you show that you truly and consistently fear God when you disregard His strong condemnation of the use of divers measures [double standards] as being an abomination to the LORD? Divers weights and divers measures, both of them are alike abominations to the LORD (Prov. 20:10). Is the...

Do you ignore and avoid the fact that the KJV sometimes used transliteration instead of translation? The Church of England makers of the KJV took some liberties in the translating process as they changed some renderings in the pre-1611 word of God in English to make them more favorable to...

Updating the archaic language in the KJV has been done, but KJV-only advocates attack and condemn English Bibles that do that. These Bibles [the 1982 NKJV, the 1987 Literal Translation in The Interlinear Bible, the 1990 Modern King James Version, the 1994 21st Century King James Version, the...

Your question was soundly answered. You dodge and avoid what I actually stated as you ask a question that attempts to put words in my mouth that I did not suggest. It may be KJV-only reasoning that seems to suggest that God is not engaged in the maintenance of His word testimony in...

The Scriptures do not teach that God ordained the making of the 1611 KJV. The Scriptures do not state nor teach that the word of God is bound to the textual criticism decisions, Bible revision decisions, and translation decisions of one exclusive group of Church of England critics in 1611...

The 1611 KJV was the new modern translation in 1611, and it was a revision of multiple, varying pre-1611 translations. Incomplete list of some new Bibles made before 1901 Haak’s 1657 English translation of 1637 Dutch Staten Bible 1755 N. T. by John Wesley; whole English translation later...

Here are some examples of KJV-only authors asserting non-true claims including this enduring myth concerning KJV editions. Timothy Morton contended that "the 1762 and 1769 [editions] were to update the spelling" and that "by 1769 whatever slight textual errors that still remained were removed...

KJV-only advocate Matthew Verschuur asserted: “One of the most enduring myths regarding the King James Bible is that the common and standard edition in use in the 20th and 21st centuries is the 1769 Edition” (Vintage Bibles, p. 47). KJV defender Laurence Vance wrote: “There are 750 differences...