Search results

That's not what I asked. I asked "WHEN" did you guys fall off the tracks from the teachings of your Protestant Fathers. If they were wrong about Mary - what makes you think they were right about anything else? In other words - all it takes is ONE false teaching to be a FALSE teacher - and we...

Time to destroy some more of your false claims . . . YOUR claim that an anathema is "basically eternal damnation" is basically asinine. Anathemas are BIBLICAL forms of discipline and not "eternal damnations". They are excommunications - and are recommended by Paul for those who engage in...

Another load of horse manure posted by yet another uninformed anti-Catholic. This is what happens what you cut-and-paste without doing your homework . . . So many things are wrong with your posts that it's difficult to know where to begin - so let's just start with your first line: "The...

Sooooo, when did THESE teachings from the Reformers get rejected by modern-day Protestants??

WRONG. I quoted several of the in post #26. Ummmm, they ALSO believed in and taught about her Perpetual virgiity . . . Reformers on Perpetual Virginity of Mary Martin Luther Christ, our Savior, was the real and natural fruit of Mary’s virginal womb . . . This was without the cooperation of a...

In the spirit of the thread - I was simply asking when Protestants strayed from the teachings of the Reformers on Mary. Do you know - and why??

Jesus unites to Himself TWO natures: 1) FULLY divine 2) FULLY Human These two natures are indivisible. Jesus is FULLY God. Jesus if FULLY Human. Mary gave birth to Jesus - NOT a "nature" - any more than YOUR mother gave birth to a "nature". Sooooo, when did Protestants stray from the teachings...

I could ask the SAME question as to why Protestant churches of today have backed away from the Reformer's positions o several things, such as "Mary, Mother of God": Martin Luther: (Martin Luther, Martin Luther's Works, vol. 7, pg 592) (Martin Luther, Martin Luther's Works, vol. 7, pg 572)...

WRONG. The angel said to Mary: "YOU will conceive." He didn’t say, "A child will be IMPLANTED". SHE conceived, which means HER egg was fertilized. This destroys your entire argument . . .

Then SHOW ME the verse. WHERE does it say that Mary was just a surrogate?? Is Scripture lying when it calls her His "Mother"??

Ummmmmm, I struggle with biology?? As I educated you earlier - Scripture calls Mary the MOTHER of Jesus. A woman whose egg is not used to conceive and is merely a vessel is called a “surrogate”. Can you show me where the Bible calls Mary a “surrogate” and NOT a mother?? That's what I thought...

And yet, you continue to FAIL to show me where the Bible teaches ANYTHING other than the fact that Mary was Jesus’ mother – FULLY and COMPLETELy. WHY is that??

Like I said befor - Show me where the Bible teaches ANYTHING other than the fact that Mary was Jesus’ mother – FULLY and COMPLETELY. I especially want to read the part where it says that she was only a “vessel” and nothing more. Chapter and Verse, please . . .

Your heretical position that Christ was not fully human is called “Docetism” – and it’s nothing new. This heresy was addressed and defeated over 1500 years ago. Show me where the Bible teaches ANYTHING other than the fact that Mary was Jesus’ mother – FULLY and COMPLETELY. I especially want to...

If the body is sin as you erroneously claim – then Christ was sinful. That is flat-out heresy. The body is simply the MEANS for us to sin. We ALSO sin in our mind and heart – without the Body, as Christ taught regarding adultery. STUDY your Bible . . ..

And your insistence on being dishonest will be judged. We don't "worship" anybody but God. As for Mary needing a Savior - she did. He saved her at conception.

Our bodies are not the SOURCE of sin. That is the point. If your body was the source of sin – then Christ would have been sinful because HE had a human body. Get it now??

Yes, I was agreeing with you, insofar as our body is not sinful. Sin is something we do in our spirit, in our soul. Our body is simply the vessel by which we commit the sin.

“Kin” doesn’t mean uterine sibling. There are brothers, step[ brothers, half brothers, cousins, uncles, nephews, neighbors, fellow countrymen and fellow believers in the NT that are ALL referred to as “Adelphos”. Any attempt to randomly pigeonhole this word into ONE definition is a complete...

It's not a physical ATTRIBUTE. and therefore not inheritable. This is what I meant by your perversion of what was said. . .