Search results

But his "theology" which he claims to be from Scripture, is on a vital Doctrine, and very wrong and misleading.

you say, "I don't think that we can consider one lexicon as an authority over another", but surely this cannot be right? The Greek lexicon by Dr Joseph Thayer can be very useful and is much used around the world. However, Thayer was a Unitarian who rejected the Holy Trinity, Deity of Jesus...

I personally cannot understand the need to read any works by people like Barth, Kierkegaard, Wright, or Bultmann, who have the core Doctrines of the Bible wrong. There are so many people of "sound mind" that we can refer to and use, being Biblically based, than to have the time or need for those...

regardless of what one might "know", it is useless without the aid of the Holy Spirit. But, then too we have to be open to the possibility, that what we have believed in for many years, might be completely wrong. Some cannot do this for reasons known to them.

N. T. Wright is very much unbiblical on Justification, hence would be a Liberal

Surely all Christians including those who minister the Word of God, and called to be overseers in the Church, should be humble and have a servants heart, as we are all equally, "δοῦλος", slaves of the Lord Jesus Christ. Why the need to take "Reverend", where the use of the Hebrew verb, יָרֵא (as...

There are some who admit that the Lord Jesus Christ "died" for the whole human race, in some special way, but deny that this equates to the actual Atonement that Jesus made through His death on the cross. This is no more than "splitting hairs", as the death of Jesus Christ IS His Atonement for...

how about simply a Bible-believing Christian?

nonsense!

Your 5 points are more about what you believe, and does not represent the teachings of the Holy Bible.

Because most Calvinists misuse the Scriptures for their purposes, rather than accept what it actually says, even if their are wrong in their beliefs for many years. They like to mock you, or attack your knowledge of Scripture or languages, laugh at mistakes of grammar, some even go around...

Notice how our Calvinistic friends are silent here, they are stumped by the Truth in the Word of God. Paul's words here basically destroy their unbiblical nonsense!

"For when the Gentiles, who have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else...

τοὺς σωζομένους, as you rightly say, is the present passive participle, where the literal meaning must be, "those saved from time to time", an ongoing "adding" as they were being saved.

some only see what they want to

A T Robertson "That betrayeth (tou paradidontos). Present active participle, actually engaged in doing it. The hand of Judas was resting on the table at the moment. It should be noted that Luke narrates the institution of the Lord's Supper before the exposure of Judas as the traitor while Mark...

We are back to Luke 22 and the Lord's Supper which Judas took part in, and Jesus says to Him and the 11, This is My blood shed for YOU. Can't escape this fact, which even John Gill and Matthew Henry, both Calvinists, admit!

when he agrees with you?

Charles Ellicott (RV chair, parent version of RSV) "The Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.—Many of the better MSS. omit the words “to the Church,” and connect “together,” which in the Greek is the first word in Act_3:1, with this verse—The Lord added together . . . The verb...

:Roflmao