Search results

How do you understand the placement of the High Sabbath days in correlation with the weekly Sabbaths?

According to Lev. 23:5-6, the 14th is the Passover, beginning on the 15th the unleavened bread taken. But this is an oversight, unleavened bread is eaten with the Passover on the 14th as you said. I copied the 7 High Sabbaths online and didn't see it, but you did! That's some good attention...

What separates dummy Charlie24 from the scholars is they say if the High Sabbath falls in a weekday it's placed before the weekly Sabbath. When I studied this years ago I didn't understand it and never pursued it. Maybe you know something about what I was to lazy to pursue.

There are 7 feasts yearly that are High Sabbaths, days of rest. First Day of Unleavened Bread: 15th of Abib/Nisan (Lev. 23:6-7). Last Day of Unleavened Bread: 21st of Abib/Nisan (Lev. 23:8). Feast of Weeks (Pentecost): (Lev. 23:21). Feast of Trumpets: 1st of Tishri (Lev. 23:24-25). Day of...

To make my position clear for what it's worth, man is able on his own to reason the Gospel when he hears it, but totally unable to come to the knowledge of the truth (salvation) without the drawing of the Holy Spirit when the Gospel is heard. This is not the same total depravity as claimed by...

That particular timeline coincides with a full 3 days and 3 night in the tomb. Most but not all scholars believe this to be what actually happened, the ones I've read anyway.

I won't argue it, but I believe as many that preparation day in John 19:31 was not for the weekly Sabbath but the yearly "High Sabbath."

I don't know much about the SBC, but our IFB independently supports missionaries. Back in the day, don't know about now, that was a difference.

It's like Treasury Sec. Bessent said, the POTUS has a great big tool box to pull from. I'm thinking it's a bullet he can dodge and carry on.

Yes, that was brought up also, and I agree, and if any of it is left to Congress nothing will get done. It seems it's the same as us here on the boards, whose interpretation is the correct one?

Judge Kavanaugh ruled for Trump and in his ruling quoted the other sections of the Constitution that allowed him tariff control in different situations without engaging Congress. So it will be interesting how this turns out.

I heard 2 different Constitution experts say Trump can use the tariffs the way he is doing under several sections of the Constitution. They said the SCOTUS decision is under just one of those sections. They also said this decision was to hopefully engage Congress, citing Trump is overreaching...

The Treasury recorded $195 Billion increase in 2025 from global tariffs. From what I hear Trump is pulling Executive strings in his power. We will have to wait and see what actually happens.

This means that fat check we were looking for from the tariffs is no more.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-decision-donald-trump-tariff-powers One SC judge has said the US may be required to return millions in tariffs. John Roberts said the power of tariffs belongs to Congress.

Micah 6:8 "He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" When it comes down to the bottom line of everyday living for us who call on the name of the Lord, it's just simply do what you...

Well said, Dave!

I'm not a Catholic, but anything that would bring focus on the Lord can't be bad for us. Within reason of course.

Paul is here speaking of justification by Grace through faith VS. a salvation of works. Read and see if you can see the cancellation. Rom. 11:6-8 "And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work...

It's not faith alone if you are depending on a man to perform a ceremony (water baptism) on your behalf to complete your salvation. As I've said several times recently that is works and cancels out Grace.