Search results

Your point was decrying immigrant groups who refuse to "assimilate"; I gave you the Amish as the example par excellence of such a group

Neither can two divorced people

It's a fairly obvious point: just because something was legal then doesn't mean it should be now, and vice versa

So deport the Amish on that basis then

Ah well that's ok then. Money talks

So does divorce. Presumably you'd be happy with stores refusing service to remarried divorcees

I was more thinking of his persecuted beliefs that mortgage fraud and hitting people are ok

Or Italian-Americans, Irish-Americans, Polish-Americans, African-Americans, etc not living together in communities. We all tend to gravitate towards People Like Us (PLU) and tend to regard with suspicion those who are not PLU. Such is human nature as evidenced on this board. As Christians...

Yep, maybe all the white Americans should push off back to Europe and leave the place to the Native Americans. Put your own house in order before you take a pop at others': Muslim women were attacked just hours after Trump's win

It's nothing to do with his class. "Poor Tommy" needs to understand that if he wants to live in our country then there are certain laws he needs to obey. Or he can live somewhere else. His choice.

Thanks for reinforcing then that it's not about the legality of the immigration. Keep digging that hole...

Just to remind you that it's your friend Yaxley-Lennon and his EDL chums who are the neo-Nazi, not your average Muslim.Street attacks on Muslims rocket in UK as perpetrators feel 'emboldened' by political rhetoric

Nope. Way to miss the point. They would be like Beth Din courts. I hate to break it to the compiler of that list, but "Der Sturmer" isn't recruiting these days

The shame is that our government is selling arms to these same people who crucified a man in Mecca last month.

Roll back 80 years, change 'Muslim' to 'Jew', 'mosque' to 'synagogue' and throw some German organisations or towns in instead of the English names and see how the above reads...

Thank you for thus. It is very telling, in particular the second paragraph where she lumps in legal immigration as part of her perceived problem. As I said on page 1, this isn't about law it's about race

So it was never about the legality of immigration but about race. As suspected

Yes he is. Here's a sample from just one of his tweets: "What do you call a paki that dont (sic) smell? Asif."

Why not? Neither does the first on that reasoning, yet you admit that the first is not protected

Untrustworthy