Laura Ingraham Targets Even Legal Immigrants In Off-The-Rails Rant

[church mouse guy]

Based on that, I figure you oppose the recent allowing of Melania Trump’s parents into the country based on her relationship with them.

It's not nice to attack the President's family. Melania's parents are rich--no welfare involved.

 

[Matt Black]

The same sex marriage violates the law of God, but those other cases would not fall under same prohibition!

So does divorce. Presumably you'd be happy with stores refusing service to remarried divorcees

 

[Matt Black]

It's not nice to attack the President's family. Melania's parents are rich--no welfare involved.

Ah well that's ok then. Money talks

 

[Matt Black]

All of those groups you mentioned though have their own culture AND have become Americanized, while many muslim communities in England refuse to get westernized, and are still abiding by Islamic and stae national law, so when terrorists come out from their ranks, Governmen and police are afraid to intervene!

So deport the Amish on that basis then

 

[KenH]

The same sex marriage violates the law of God, but those other cases would not fall under same prohibition!

The United States is not a theocracy.

 

[Revmitchell]

The United States is not a theocracy.

And yet at its founding, that behavior was completely outlawed in the states.

 

[KenH]

It's not nice to attack the President's family. Melania's parents are rich--no welfare involved.

So you are not a supporter of the merit-based immigration idea. I will try to keep that in mind.

 

[KenH]

And yet at its founding, that behavior was completely outlawed in the states.

And slavery was legal. So what’s your point?

 

[Revmitchell]

And slavery was legal. So what’s your point?

So what if slavery was legal?

 

[KenH]

So you are not a supporter of the merit-based immigration idea. I will try to keep that in mind.

Forcing African-Americans to use separate restrooms and water fountains is used to be legal. Separate but equal schools used to be legal.

You can’t use the Bible to justify such laws.

Those things were legal because the United States is not a theocracy.

 

[Revmitchell]

You can’t use the Bible to justify such laws.

Yes we can and doing so doesn't create a theocracy.

 

[Yeshua1]

So does divorce. Presumably you'd be happy with stores refusing service to remarried divorcees[/QUOTE

Not the same, as 2 men cannot have a valid mariage in eyes of God!

 

[Yeshua1]

The last time I checked, Amish were not blowing up buildings and behanding people for jesus!

 

[Yeshua1]

Those views were all against the scriptures, as is same sex weddings!

 

[KenH]

Yes we can and doing so doesn't create a theocracy.

I double dog dare you to try to use the Bible to justify a Christian treating a person as a second-class citizen based on skin color.

 

[Yeshua1]

The United States is not a theocracy.

No, but was based upon scripture foundations...

 

[Yeshua1]

I double dog dare you to try to use the Bible to justify treating a person as a second-class citizen based on skin color.

The thing is that we would not turn away a gay couple, but do not force us to accprt their marriage as being legit!

 

[KenH]

The thing is that we would not turn away a gay couple, but do not force us to accprt their marriage as being legit!

Same-sex marriage is not legitimate. We agree.

 

[TCassidy]

Yep, maybe all the white Americans should push off back to Europe and leave the place to the Native Americans.

LOL! ROFLOL! My father immigrated to the US when he was 14, in 1924. He came with his father, Francisco de la Mora who was born in Mexico City, and his mother, Ida May Dudley, born in Derrygonnelly, county Fermanagh, in the lake country of Northern Ireland. They met and married in Toronto, Canada.

My paternal ancestry dates back over 1000 years here in Hidalgo/Tamaulipas. So put your bigoty and hatred away and just accept the facts instead of your bitterness over the colonials kicking you to the curb and running you off the continent and back to your pathetic island of clerks and shop keepers.

 

[TCassidy]

So you are not a supporter of the merit-based immigration idea.

Where it you get the idea the ability to amass copious amounts of money is not a strong merit?