Search results

This 'vapor canopy' held 286,599 times as much water as the atmosphere now holds? You have not shown scripturally any verification of this fracturing. Even if so, is there close to a billion cubic miles of water 'down there' superheated in the mantle or core?

You said, regarding fish, " Probably most but not all." And you said no to paramecia, and "I wish" to amoebae. So don't say you're not putting your own ideas into this where scripture does not tell us. The water prevailed more and more upon the earth, so that all the high mountains everywhere...

NeilOneB,.noticing more than once you equate the woman caught in adultery with Mary Magdalene, do you believe she is also the brother of Lazarus, who was a leper,?

No, it doesn't answer the question of whether there were only 2 of them spared via the ark. Evidently you 'exempt' microbes, though scripture does not tell us that, and it is an apparent conclusion that undersea creatures were exempt. But the real heart of the matter is that the worldwide flood...

Paramecia and amoebae were spared? How about mesquitos? Ticks? Viruses?

Fish? Seals? Paramecia? Amoeba?

The Business Of Conspiracy Theories

'Most' national security?

An INformal rule, then?

That's an excellent point. Even if Oswald had gone to trial and been found not guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, that is not proof of anyone else having done it. And, as the OJS trial showed, skilled defense lawyers can insert that doubt. And one of the best ways to get the accused off is to...

If Oswald had lived to be tried, the court would not judge if he were the LONE assassin; just if he were guilty, If I recall correctly, that TV movie, The Trial of Lee Harvey Oswald, ended right before the verdict was announced. The audience is left to determine its own 'verdict.' My interest...

You've probably seen this before-- a section of Beyond Conspiracy-- which deals with the lone gunman conclusion, as well as the psychological need to believe there had to be more to it. But as I've already said, you will deny anything that does not tickle your ear about how you interpret what...

Frank advice wanted You mean kosher or nonkosher?

You just showed right there the conspiracy theorist's mind. "The idea" that someone insignificant could take out the arguably most powerful man in the world is-- has to be-- "preposterous," so you refuse to think logically without bias about the event, no matter what facts are presented.

In this clip from Walter Cronkite Remembers, he recounts the CBS special of 1968, in which their crew did its own investigation into the conclusions of the Warren Commission-- he admitted with the intent of proving it wrong. But he says "... all we did was prove it right" This begins at 1:25...

Which would be......? [A rule against it or not??]

Are we going to be concerned about what really happened back there back then? I rather think not

Notice that verse presumes that anyone who would take away the words of prophecy does have a part in the book of life and the holy city that can be taken away. That can ruffle some theological feathers, especially Baptist ones. I don't quite know what you mean. Is it that God would kill the...

It seems to me the obvious question to this would be: if public school students want to come to class completely naked, should the schools have no such rule against it?

When I was in the 7th grade (1971-72), our schools had a dress code that stated shirt tails must be tucked in, no lettering except for 'school-oriented' attire, dresses or skirts had to be less than 6 inches above the 'fold' in the knee, girls could not wear jeans, and nobody could wear shorts...