Search results

It sure has.

Of course Trump doesn't. Hence the frustration of such an easy opportunity he had for a quick win. Not enough democrats speak out. BLM's biggest issue isn't the ideology in which it started. It's the lack of true leadership to reel in their fringe participants. Now the news will focus on...

Yeah seriously how hard is that to do.

Get a big enough group of people together in that situation and there will be those choose to do just that. They sure aren't helping anything are they?

No I'm really not.

That sounds almost like encouraging violence. How do you even know all these counterprotestors were aligned with either? You don't think some people simply wanted to counterprotest white supremacy. Does that alone make you a BLM or Antifa participant?

I'm not but as you are so fond of pointing out, I have my rights to do as I please or is that only reserved for the KKK.

Um. True?

Of course they do. Why do you think groups like Antifa and BLM became prevalent in the last two years? BLM began as a a simple hashtag in response to the perception of unarmed black people being killed by police. Without any real leadership though there have risen unsavory types who take it...

Sorry, people hate white supremacists. Boo hoo.

People get into fights all that time over things like politics, sports, etc. They always will. The KKK and Neonazis are a little different don't you think? We are talking about resurgence of two of the most embarrassing ideologies in the history of this country. No I don't equate...

Whatever dude. It is exactly what happened. Good grief how hard is to say you are against the KKK and Nazis and maybe to tell David Duke that you aren't his guy. It was a PR win set on a tee for crying out loud and he missed it. Thankfully other Republicans know how to take the temperature...

Nah he missed his chance to be at the forefront of it...I.e. show leadership. The super bland "I decry violence" is kind of a no brainer and should pretty much be the default position of a sane person. It was a cop out statement when a real and present enemy with a name from a violent and...

Why because it took 48 hours of media pressure and flack from his own party to get pressured into finally putting a name on it? I'm not impressed. He's reacting to public opinion, not the incident.

No, we decided to. Not sure it was worth the effort. We certainly didn't have to do it. W simply chose to.

We didn't have to do anything of the sort in Baghdad. The real world isn't just a game of risk. You gotta worry about others responses to such actions in the real world.

I wasn't making a gun rights statement I was simply saying that those people went expecting and maybe even hoping for a fight. And got one.

I'm not talking about a legal standpoint here, I'm just saying what that is the reality of the situation.

Sure they show up under the auspices of peaceful protest but we all know that is the furthest thing from their mind.

Antifa exists because no one else is opposing the revival of white supremacists. You can take the cop out "violence is terrible attitude" while patting yourself on the back for your courageous virtue signaling but it is an empty statement. I can read just fine Curtis.