Search results

Lets please keep this to the topic at hand and not make personal jabs at members.

So one or two references in a few episodes is being beaten over the head with it? Reading comprehension is a ok over here but thanks for throwing that jab in there bud! I was simply pointing out that you have your issues and he has his. I think you are making a huge deal about a few small lines...

I just wanted to make sure as I wasn't 100% understanding exactly what you were saying :)

Nor is a black guy stating how bad history has been for him annoying when traveling back to different eras. It is historically accurate. To each their own though!

What part of the Executive order demands is that local law enforcement collect immigration status information from those that are arrested, which is not required by law. If the local law enforcement does not comply, then the Trump administration is threatening withholding Federal money. This...

From what I am reading there is a 50/50 chance of renewal for Timeless. I really hope they at least get a second season. I find myself watching the show and then googling references made in the show to read up a bit on them. Plus the story line of time travel and its implications have always...

Great, we can finally move on to the actual legal issue at hand in the complaint!

It is one of my favorite shows. I loved the Space Program one :)

I 100% support the tax holiday. We need to bring that money back in. I am still skeptical but we will see how it plays out. It is very important for Trump's legacy right here. He needs to get this passed and pay for it. If he does that it will be huge for his legacy.

I just don't understand how we make up a 20% of reduction of Corporate tax income with "growth". Cuts are always very hard to get through so that will be very tough with such a narrow margin in the Senate and upcoming House elections in 2018.

I don't agree with the S Corps benefiting from the 20% cut nor do I agree with the top taxed getting a cut either. The rest, sounds good. Now, how do we pay for it?

So, this isn't tax reform this is broad tax cuts and extra deductions with most of the actual cuts at the corporate level. Am I missing something else? Haven't dug to much into it yet.

I didn't say you should. I said you could. Just like you said I could also give more money to the Federal Government. As to the rest of your comments, I've already stated my opinion and don't wish to go around in circles on it.

I sure do know that. You also have options to move to a country that has a more like minded economic view point if your view point is not accepted by your fellow citizens, which it appears it has not been. If you see that changing in the future then stick around for it. However, I do not see...

I don't need to study it beyond this complaint. The complaint, I feel, has validity. My political views on sanctuary cities are not important to this complaint. My concerns are a Government that is overreaching and breaking the Constitution to benefit their needs politically. Withholding...

It isn't an absurd claim. They are not required to collect this information from anyone. That is the law. You seem to be a stickler for the law unless it doesn't fit your needs. The law states that local law enforcement is only suppose to collect information when arresting a person as defined by...

Why do you continue to ask me something I have already answered? That is not what is being argued in this case. I won't entertain you anymore if you can't understand this. I have respected you and answered the question you keep asking me more than once now.

Like I said, agree to disagree here. I've said all I can say about my opinion on the matter. I am happy you are comfortable with your view. We both are with each of our views.

They have rights and one of those rights is to not have to collect additional personal information. Only what is required by law. Immigration status is not required by law in their jurisdiction and therefore they do not have to collect it and can not be required to. That is what is being...

I have already answered that and it has nothing to do with what is being challenged. This challenge is about the rights of local law enforcement, which are U.S. Citizens. Again, I will not repeat what I have already said anymore after this. So with that, you have your answer and if you would...