Search results

Only if it's the other side doing it---!!!:laugh::laugh:

targus sez: Don't confuse the issue with facts; the left can't handle it!!:tongue3::laugh:

Very true - how much coverage to the conservative view-point, except in a mocking vein of course, do you find in the MS outlets????????

Absent any other changes, just how will this improve the education system??? Oops, forgot - the "0" is the "author" of this insane idea, so it's "GOT TO BE GOOD"! Apply a few other changes, specifically eliminating any, ANY, ANY Washington input into a local endeavor (educating our...

Perzactly!!! This whole fiasco of the way the Ds have turned on ACORN makes me think of the old saw of the "wolf in sheep's clothing"! They threw ACORN under the bus too quickly for me to accept it as genuine. Can you picture the vicious dog that loves the taste of the mail-man's calf...

Obviously A.W. is one of the few in the entertainment industry, (as far as I know of anyway) that has a sense of discernment that still functions. May his tribe increase!!

As with all proverbs, the context of the originator must be taken into account, simply because there are many conflicting (or seemingly so) proverbs that are equally "accepted"! A couple of examples: Absence makes the heart grow fonder vs Out of sight, out of mind OR He who hesitates is...

SN sez: A good person to ask this question is Neville Chamberlain, as he could give a real good 1st person answer. 'Tain't what the lefties want to hear though!

Bolded mine You're the one who introduced it, (post # 4 " You just hate our country's first black president.") why should anybody else answer this question?

Generally, it's not the common citizen one has to be wary of - it's the elitist govt bureaucrats and the stuff that's "for our own good"!! IE: the U S of A. The exception being the ones the govt teat is so graciously nourishing.

How can you be so naive????? Everyone, EVERYONE, (well, all liberals anyway:laugh:) knows that any opposition to the "0" is strictly on the basis of skin color alone!!!! What other reason could there possibly be?????:tonofbricks:

1-NO 2-Who says they do/should? That's the advantage of following ole Teddy's advice (definitely NOT Kennedy!), of "Walk softly, but carrying a big stick." Course that's not in the vocabulary of the "0" though, is it?

If it bugged me as much as it "seems" to bug you, this is exactly what I'd do!!:BangHead: Fact, if things were that stodgy, I'd probably be looking even if it didn't bug me.:smilewinkgrin:

This is all well and good IF you trust the Russians. Frankly, this tells me nothing more than that the US is finally laying down "the big stick" and now Russia feels no need to be concerned with any retaliation should they decide to use the popular "tank 'em" method - that Russia seems to do so...

Ditto that!! As well as the country itself!:BangHead:

Issues, if dealt with biblically, negate the necessity of mentioning a specific name, which I am opposed to anyway, simply because if you name names in this "political" instance, you are going to make some/many parishioners mad at you, and any positive influence that you may have had is gone...

Can't believe I'm agreeing with alatide, but this would be the most beneficial thing this congress could do for this country - 24/7 for the duration of this congressional term. Anything to keep them out of our lives!!!!!:thumbs::thumbs: I'm proud of you alatide, you're coming around!!:love2:

You repeat yourself, MP!:laugh:

Charles Krathamer (sp?) had a great retort to this bit of journalistic bovine excrement, not exact, but close: "In my previous profession, when people heard things that were not said, we gave them some medication that usually helped!" Probably Maureen just forgot her dose the day she heard...

MP sez: I rarely agree with MP, and this is no exception; the only difference is that I disagree more strongly than usual this time!:smilewinkgrin: