Search results

Here are the facts: a grand jury was convened. They considered evidence from 911 calls, the law enforcement personnel involved, etc. A grand jury determined that no indictment would be made. A grand jury determined that it's not "seemingly" justifiable, but absolutely justifiable. As for...

LOL Your sarcasm is duly noted.

The last part that I bolded for emphasis, is exactly why the DoD would transfer these assets to a state unit. The Guard is funded through the State; thus, the DoD keeps the capability, but the money comes from state revenue instead of out of the DoD budget. Additionally, you should ask your...

"If"? What exactly do you mean by that? Are you implying you think the father took the opportunity to kill another man, and passed it off as defense of his daughter? Or are you implying some type of racial motive? Or what? "If"? Seriously? And "killer"? Everything points to a father defending...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/19/us/texas-abuser-father/index.html?hpt=hp_t2 Hoo-ah!

That is so COOL. But ya gotta tell me: did the video game skills help or hinder?

Thank you, HeirofSalvation. You've pretty much summed up my position on the subject as well.

Read what I wrote. The answer is in there.

And thus, your answer is to not vote at all, and allow evil to reign unchallenged.

By "no republican," do you mean no congressman, governor, or other political figure? Because there were several of us here on the board that complained.

:thumbsup:

If you carefully read what I wrote, you'll see that I answered you.

Not sure I agree. What if your only two candidates were an atheist, or a muslim, or a mormon; and someone who professes to be a Christian, but furthers the gay agenda, supports Planned Parenthood, etc.? If we start going down that road, no one would ever vote....

This is a very simple decision process. You can vote for someone, or against someone. If you don't like what our current president has done/is doing, and don't want to see it go further, then you should vote against him. And that means voting for the candidate who has the best chance of...

Here's where you're wrong: up until just recently, the two people you mention were guilty of violating Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Adultery has never been specified, but when prosecuted, has been done so under Article 134. In both cases, the fact is that your CO...

Interesting. I was about to quote Free's last post and agree with him; but then read this, and realized: by agreeing with Free, I would be implying that anyone professing to be saved but guilty of cussing, must necessarily have their salvation questioned. Unless we agree that Christians are...

Gina, I would venture to say that you and I don't hang out with people for whom that type of language is "natural"; I did when I was younger, and was more exposed to it before I joined the military (yet another reason for homeschooling my kids). Before the military, we just didn't do it in front...

There you go being derogatory towards the military again. You could have said real estate or stock broker; because you're correct that what's in the heart will eventually work its way out. But most people "learn" to cuss well before they join the military, or become stock brokers. I started...

As a general rule, I believe a lot of people that call themselves baptists aren't saved. That a lot of people calling themselves Christians aren't saved. If your point is that it seems someone is saying that simply because they're coptics they're not saved, well, I'd have to agree with you and...

Didn't say "the baptist way" is the only way to get saved. Didn't mean to imply that, either. Ain't saying that baptists are the only ones with the corner on the truth. Met a catholic chaplain once; name of Father Ryan (yeah, yeah; stereotype, but it's the truth). He took me to the side one...