Search results

Which is not quite the same as "once saved always saved"

God the Father altready had chosen them to be found in Christ from etrnity past

I am quite sure that there are portions of the TR Greek text that is closer to the originals, but also sure same can be said of the Critical Greek text

All whom Jesus died for shall be saved

Due to them not believing were in the Original Greek text

You are circular reasoning that the Kjv translation was actually in the original text

And the Esv, nkjv, Niv etc

The promise of God to preserve His word was in the original Languages, NOT to any English translation

None reallyu saved and sealed by the Noly spirit shall lose their eternal life in christ, but they can be those as one who ran thru the fire and smoke and made it

The Holy Spirit though did seem to allow the Apostles to link to Jesus what was not the immediate situation originally applied to when was prophesied

You do know though that the Nnasb and Esv would and do support the deity of jesus even more so then the Kjv then, correct?

Just was stating the truth that is the KJVOO themselves are very inconsistent on applying their own logic towards the Kjv translation they do the Nkjv, Nasb, eytc

I was referring also to how at times the Apostles seemed to apply OT prophecies to Jesus as a later and future fulfillment, for example, out of Egypt now called my Son was to israel in OT, but now applied to jesus

Since the 1611 translators per KJVO had inspiration to make the perfect English bible, why ever any changed needed period then?

The 1769 King James Version (KJV) revision, primarily led by Benjamin Blayney, standardized spelling, punctuation, and updated archaic grammar from the 1611 edition to improve readability, with over 1,000 minor changes, such as changing "sinnes" to "sins," "burnt" to "burned," and updating "v"...

We know right now that they are not

You are creating here a theology more akin to islam and Allah, as He destines all and everything period, but we who hold to calvinism do not see God as operating in a Fatalistic sense

His theology was not perfect, but much better then what gets passed as theology currently

the very basis of our Justification would be the atonement of Jesus at Calvary, and the means to access that effectual grace would be thru saving grace

I am a Calvinist, so the person if one of the elect would indeed come to Jesus while on death bed, but even if was not a Calvinist, would say that one living in sin entire life would not even desire to get saved, due to hardening their hearts towards Jesus and rejecting conviction of Holy Spirit...