Search results

Has this thread defined "Annihilation?" 1) The belief when we physically die, our conscious awareness ends, there is no afterlife. 2) The belief when we physically die, we are taken either to Hades or to Heaven. Those taken to Heaven live forever. Those taken to Hades suffer torment for...

1) I have placed my faith in the truth that God exists and rewards those who please Him. Hebrews 11:6 2) I speak to God through prayer, God speaks to me through His inspired Word, my bible. 3) I believe I know God and God knows me. I believe I am indwelt and my Helper guides me in my...

An entire post of "against the person" drivel, rather than any effort to discuss the topic. We are chosen INDIVIDUALLY when God credits our faith in Christ as righteousness. Calvinism denies 2 Thessalonians 2:13 claiming it actually means God did NOT chose us through faith in the truth. All...

Unbiblical nonsense. People can close their own minds, unwilling to question their own beliefs. James 1:26 ring a bell? Or how about Proverbs 9:7-9?

Did he say he understands Christ was just when He sacrificed His life, that He was NOT "made to be a sinner" was just "treated as a sinner" and the "made to be a sinner" translation is in error? I had wished for more "edification" but no...

LOL, now we have the we were declared righteous after we were made the righteousness of God by the washing of regeneration. I kid you not...

You can certainly think as you please. Since scripture teaches we were INDIVIDUALLY chosen during our physical lifetime, after we existed as "NOT A PEOPLE" chosen for God's own possession, your view is unbiblical. Folks, note how they do not distinguish between corporate or individual...

Yet another post of gibberish, running away from truth. avoiding the issue that we did not become the righteousness of God by imputation. I do not believe any of these naysayers even know that the righteousness of God refers to Christ being without sin, and we also become without sin, by the...

I had three of them, but the Doctor told me because of my age, I do not need another. I have never had any work done on my prostrate, and hopefully, I will be called home before I do.

I do not believe any of these naysayers even know that the righteousness of God refers to Christ being without sin, and we also become without sin, by the washing of regeneration in Him. The washing of regeneration is not imputation.

You can copy and paste these Calvinist fictions till the cows come home, we are not made the righteousness of God by imputation. We are made the righteousness of God by the blood of Jesus.

Yet another post of gibberish, avoiding the issue that we did not become the righteousness of God by imputation.

Against the Person argumentation is the trademark of false teachers. Next, you try, like a child, to change the subject to me. These Calvinists have not shown any ability to discuss scripture, or defend their false doctrines, but only to offer lame diversions. We were chosen through faith...

Calvinism makes a scrambled egg out of God's pristine word. No one claims God did not choose us in Him before the foundation of the world, your fiction is God choose us as individuals before the foundation of the world, when 1 Peter 2:9-10 precludes that bogus interpretation.

You can copy and paste these Calvinist fictions till the cows come home, we are not made the righteousness of God by imputation. We are made the righteousness of God by the blood of Jesus.

The very idea that the KJV, or one of them, is "the official word for the world" is a fiction conjured by provincialism. There is safety in setting our course and sticking to it. We are to study to show ourselves approved, accurately handling God's word to the best of our understanding.

Folks, have you read Psalm 7:11 in context. It is all about God judging people, the wicked, and the righteous. That is why the conclusion of the vast majority of modern translations say God is a just judge or words to that affect. And as a righteous judge, He would not always be angry with...

Does not match mine? What prattle!!!! I cited the NKJV, the ESV, the NASB, the NET and could list all modern translations. Even translations before the KJV got it right, such as Tyndale. And some got it wrong and the KJV followed down the rabbit hole.

Ben asks for an explanation a 5 year old can understand. I understand personal incredulity is a fallacious argument. Here is my guess at the question Ben claims not to understand: "Explain how Christ as a "made sinner was just.?" Ben says he does not understand the question, perhaps because...

Scripture precludes being chosen as individuals before the foundation of the world as we existed as "not a people" chosen for His possession. The rest of the post is that of a sand box bully, shouting and throwing sand, all sound and fury signifying nothing.