Search results

Yes, those who push false doctrine have the right to believe they are advocating truth, but there is a price, and if they prevent others from entering the kingdom, the price will be high.

The court that counts is the court of public opinion. If the majority of voters are convinced the Democrat Party is a criminal conspiracy, then hopefully, they will vote against those condoning violence against law enforcement. Every time you see a Democrat calling MAGA fascists, you see an...

No, they use the same words, but redefine it so it is consistent with their false doctrines. Then, of course, they charge others with not understanding their rewritten definition as if it were valid. The "Reformed Baptists" are top down baptists, if you do not believe as we believe you are...

Individual Soul Liberty Every person has the right to worship according to their conscience, free from coercion. The fly in the buttermilk is the dispute arising from the lost's ability to believe the gospel. The Reformed folks, deny this with their doctrine of total spiritual inability.

Not the topic of this thread, but an off-shoot, is the question, do"Reformed Baptists" reject a number of traditional baptist distinctives? And of course, the answer would be yes. The "Reformed Baptists" are top down baptists, if you do not believe as we believe you are not one of us. And...

Yes, we offer alternative festivities, with lots of candy treats, and supporting fellowship.

According to Matthew 13:19, some unbelievers, those classified as soil #1, do not intellectually understand the gospel. And as demonstrated in an earlier post, Prevenient Grace presupposes total inability from birth. You need to pick a side. If as you correctly suggest, the lost start out...

We all knew you were advocating by implication, prevenient grace, Sir. That is why I addressed it, even though you never used those words. Van said, "But I did not see where you addressed my view that the lost are able to truly repent without being enabled by prevenient grace." Yes, posters...

Did anyone say the fire of the Lake of Fire was not eternal and therefore unquenchable? Nope. Once again, addressing what is not in contention and ignoring what is in contention.

Oh what intellectual depth, Piper 2 is right and any other view is ridiculous. No need to address the reasons why ET is only a possibility and not doctrine explicitly taught from scripture. Nope, all we need is to scream and shout and wave arms and run about....

The video of post #20 asserts that even if a person has hardened their heart, they are not disabled from "coming to their senses" and returning to God's truth. I see two conditions described in scripture. First, the one who is so hardened they cannot even grasp the gospel, such that they do...

Yes, I agree with your video demonstrating the "T" of the TULIP is false doctrine. Same truth as I quoted from Geisler. But I did not see where you addressed my view that the lost are able to truly repent without being enabled by prevenient grace. I believe the action of the lost to trust in...

The above claim is false, unstudied and absurd. Matthew 25:41 says the unsaved go into eternal fire, it does not say they may not be destroyed. Revelation 20:10 says the devil and his cohorts will be tormented day and night forever. It does not say humans will suffer the same punishment...

Hi Dave, Let us start with this quote from your opening post: Lets start out with some quotes. Charles Spurgeon said: “If I am to preach faith in Christ to a man who is regenerated, then the man, being regenerated, is saved already, and it is an unnecessary and ridiculous thing for me to...

Good Grief, "1) Eternal Punishment is well supported biblical doctrine. Just what kind of punishment is in dispute." Pointless posts of profundity provide presumption of positive proof.

None of the above doctrines are in dispute! 1) Eternal Punishment is well supported biblical doctrine. Just what kind of punishment is in dispute. 2) In the realm of darkness, separated from God, there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth is well supported biblical doctrine. The duration...

Please stay on topic and cease and desist petty personality posts addressing me rather than the topic.

Romans 8:17 NIV Now if we are children, then we are heirs—heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory. Children of God have been spiritually born anew, regenerated, and are therefore children of promise. Romans 8:17...

I think your question arises from an effort to support error. 1) Our faith in Christ must be deep seated, having a root, such that our commitment and devotion to Christ is greater than our fleshly desires for comfort and security from earthly treasures. The meaning of Luke 8:13. 2) The...

The claim eternal punishment is the same as eternal torment is imposed dogma. The issue is not the fact that the devil suffers eternal torment, the issue is the claim humans suffer the same thing. Eternal torment cannot be ruled out from scripture, but neither can it be explicitly supported.