• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search results

  1. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    The KJV translators also consulted the Greek Septuagint and Jerome's Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate. Erasmus added some readings to his edited Greek text from an edition of the Roman Catholic Latin Vulgate. KJV defender Edward F. Hills acknowledged that “sometimes also the influence of the...
  2. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    It has been substantiated that the NKJV is as faithfully based on the Textus Receptus as the pre-1611 English Bibles are and as the 1611 KJV is.
  3. L

    New Book on the Doctrine of Scripture

    I have this book IT IS WRITTEN: A BELIEVER'S GUIDE TO THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE, and I have read it. Graham Chewter wrote: “This claim of perfection is held by the ‘King James Only’ movement which arose during the 1970s and was spearheaded by the late Peter Ruckman” (Hooper, It Is Written, p...
  4. L

    Critical warning for KJB believers from Bryan Ross

    G. John Rov wrote: “At the heart of the King James Bible issue is this right here, to believe God” (Called of God, p. 38). G. John Rov asserted: “You can never bear perfect fruit if you have not believed on the King James Bible” (Concealed from Christians, p. 166). John Rov wrote: “Are you...
  5. L

    Is the 1611 KJV a hybrid translation?

    Gail Riplinger asserted that Miles Coverdale “was intimately involved in the process of the Bible’s being ’given’ (2 Tim. 3:16) and ’purified’ (Ps. 12:6, 7) in English” (Hazardous Materials, p. 1165). Gail Riplinger maintained that “God entrusted Wycliffe and Coverdale with the transmission of...
  6. L

    Is the 1611 KJV a hybrid translation?

    KJV defender David Sorenson identified the 1535 Coverdale’s Bible as “a hybrid translation” (Faithful Word, p. 102) [bold type added]. Orlaith O’Sullivan maintained that Coverdale’s “1535 Bible relies heavily on [George] Joye’s earlier translations” of the books of Psalms, “Isaiah, Jeremiah...
  7. L

    Critical warning for KJB believers from Bryan Ross

    KJV defender B=AZX3IczX26Ewem70SmHJ5yRwhnOFFZ58MzdiUJYkryEoeBViEAM3mJnPE1dri4LzQa_WLZkllBqUlCN9py44RK1u4SLXDLlXtL7N4VXbna9-j9aBc2__j5nNGqNIXR6qkaTLCNc67QKsFNNiP_F2Rc8iVwHB97Y4m--wkc_Cv60E4ahxsb4-YOaSU2io5XMAZ7UsC3KAXOrU__CbNngma4-t&__tn__=-UC%2CP-R']ryan Ross wrote: "This is a critical warning...
  8. L

    Do Wikipedia donations go toward paying liberal activists to rewrite articles?

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/wikipedia-donations-go-toward-paying-liberal-activists-to-rewrite-articles/ar-AA1QroVA?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6917af1128cf4a73a5cded50a4a4a1a8&ei=21...
  9. L

    Is this common sense?

    Mike Holloway claimed: “If a Bible has but one mistake in it, it cannot be the Bible” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, p. 110). Mike Holloway asserted: “If a Bible contains a single error, it is not a Bible and should be discarded forever” (p. 97).
  10. L

    Is this common sense?

    Mike Holloway wrote: “The KJV is God’s divine seed, because it is the Word of God. It is not a tool of the Holy Spirit; it is the Holy Spirit in printed form” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, pp. 122-123). It is clear that Mike Holloway claimed that "it [the KJV] is the Holy Spirit in...
  11. L

    Is this common sense?

    You fail to demonstrate that I do not understand the word of God and how precise it is. Are you suggesting that you agree with Mike Holloway's assertions? The same word can be used with different meanings such as Word referring to the Lord Jesus Christ and word referring to Scripture. The...
  12. L

    Is this common sense?

    After quoting John 6:63, Mike Holloway wrote: “The Word of God, the Bible, is alive because God’s Word is also the Holy Spirit” (Common Sense and the King James Bible, p. 122). Mike Holloway wrote: “The KJV is God’s divine seed, because it is the Word of God. It is not a tool of the Holy Spirit...
  13. L

    Do some KJV readings agree with Critical Text readings?

    In the following quotations, the Greek words printed in Greek letters have been transliterated to English letters. Concerning the KJV’s rendering “great things” at Luke 1:49, KJV defender Laurence Vance asserted: “The AV reading ultimately goes back to the CT [Critical Text] reading of magna”...
  14. L

    The 1611 Translators did use textual Criticism for their 1611

    KJV defender Edward F. Hills suggested that there appears “in Erasmus a humanistic tendency to treat the New Testament text like the text of any other book” (Believing Bible Study, p. 203). Jan Krans asserted: “With all the evidence presented here, we conclude that Erasmus understands and...
  15. L

    THIS is an Essentisl Tool for all KJVO to have and use now

    KJV-only advocates suggest that the ways of God are to turn over his testimony to one exclusive translation committee of biased, doctrinally-unsound Church of England critics who decided to add another English translation to a list of multiple earlier English Bible translations. Do the ways of...
  16. L

    THIS is an Essentisl Tool for all KJVO to have and use now

    Your question was answered. Are you the one trying to make this about me and others who think differently than you? You seem to be guilty of what you accuse others. You avoid answering questions that you are asked. You do not practice what you preach concerning the fear of God. You avoid...
  17. L

    THIS is an Essentisl Tool for all KJVO to have and use now

    How do you show that you truly and consistently fear God when you disregard His strong condemnation of the use of divers measures [double standards] as being an abomination to the LORD? Divers weights and divers measures, both of them are alike abominations to the LORD (Prov. 20:10). Is the...
  18. L

    THIS is an Essentisl Tool for all KJVO to have and use now

    Do you ignore and avoid the fact that the KJV sometimes used transliteration instead of translation? The Church of England makers of the KJV took some liberties in the translating process as they changed some renderings in the pre-1611 word of God in English to make them more favorable to...
  19. L

    THIS is an Essentisl Tool for all KJVO to have and use now

    Updating the archaic language in the KJV has been done, but KJV-only advocates attack and condemn English Bibles that do that. These Bibles [the 1982 NKJV, the 1987 Literal Translation in The Interlinear Bible, the 1990 Modern King James Version, the 1994 21st Century King James Version, the...
  20. L

    THIS is an Essentisl Tool for all KJVO to have and use now

    Your question was soundly answered. You dodge and avoid what I actually stated as you ask a question that attempts to put words in my mouth that I did not suggest. It may be KJV-only reasoning that seems to suggest that God is not engaged in the maintenance of His word testimony in...
Top