Search results

Never turning completely away from the lord jesus, never getting to point disavow him, never stating no longer believe in him at all

Why did you go more strong Dispy views then?

Do not think paul really could decide not to do the Apostle route, do you think he could still have stated nope?

So neither holding to Dispy nor Covenant Theology?

answers, as per the bible first one second one second one second one

Never were really saved/born again

No, as making good choices is not same as making a decision for Jesus, as lost people all the time make good decisions about their careers, families, finances, yet that is not same as those being spiritually dead trying to make now spiritual "good decisions"

Paul was not invited, he was chosen by Lord Jesus, and was commissioned and had no refusal clause

Thought that you stated id not understand Greek grammar though?

Those are the main reasons, along with false friends, that show to us that God never intended ANY translation to be THE standard and only one to be used, as over time all languages change in meaning and understanding , so even the 1611 translators understood that in the future their own work...

Is election based the sovereign will of God, or upon sovereign will of man?

Thought both were strong holders to that theology?

Jesus is God, not just a person with God

The doctrine that you reject would just be agreeing with Paul and James, as with paul we hold saved by grace alone received thru faith alone, but with james that salvations must have some fruit/evidence of a new life in Christ, and will be shown as professing and living as one ought to now be...

lost sinners with fallen natures are still free to make choices, but what they can actual choose to do would be limited to their desires and restricted by their fallen sin natures

What is ironic is that many of us spend time trying to prove that one Greek text is superior to another, yet we cannot even read yet with full understanding our translations, much less discerning between Greek texts

2 main reasons for the translation such as NRSv and new Niv would be that they wanted to try to get men and women as having same roles and positions, and to try to undercut alleged male Parochialism of the OT

One needs to know Greek grammar and using those grammars, as well as know textual criticism, though before can discern what makes a good or poor translation choice

I am reminded of the time Kenneth Copeland on tv had gone into big time rebuking of the spirit of covid, how God now bound that sickness and Satan, and he blew his hot air and said was now gone, but problem was people still catching it, some even still die, after he did all that!

I was i the Assemblies of God when first saved, and while much that I saw and heard was bogus excitement, one time a stranger came into the church, and started to tongue during worship, and one of the elders called out in a loud voice that the Lord bound that spirt of witchcraft, and that woman...