Search results

Boy, that dates ya! ;)

Stahp.

Whatever. I just cut to the chase. Got to the bottom of it. Got to brass tacks. Dispensed with the pleasantries. Choose your idiom.

No I didn't. I asked what he thought was accomplished in the Atonement. It's in the form of a yes or no question, since he is not interested in being brought into a debate. You really need to curb your revisionist tendencies.

The heart of the Gospel is shown in the memorial we regularly celebrate.

Since his Paula White seduction, his leadership has been dismal.

There were many things accomplished in the Atonement... Christ's one sacrifice, one work on the Cross, all prefigured in the myriad of rites and sacrifices of the priesthood and the temple, and the law. But the controversy Jon is raising, hidden behind all this smoke of 'agreement' he's...

I have no doubt you first heard that as "only begotten," to you now, an inaccurate notion. Did God receive you anyway? Or did you have to make a new confession and get baptized again?

That is false.

But that our debt was paid on the Cross is explicit in the law of the trespass offering, in which specific damages to the injured party, whether it be God or a man, were assessed and remunerated.

The New Jerusalem is here. And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a...

Still passive.

You're blatantly inserting your own brand of revisionism into the text to rail against faithful transmissions as corruptions. I wonder if there are any well-known christianist sects who've done the same kind of thing? Anyone?

Why the gi-normous font? Anyway... Who said He wasn't? You seem to be connecting Christ's sonship to the Incarnation. The Incarnation has nothing to do with Christ being the Son of God. The sonship of the Son is an eternal, familial standing within the Godhead. "Only begotten" is the correct...

I'll take the route Jesus took. Rev 2:14-15. But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold ... the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. Hey, Steve, that sure sounds like 'Nicolaitan' (Mormon, JW, name your poison. ) doctrine to me. Your new...

Lol. What makes Him the 'uniquely divine Son'...as opposed to the other sons of God? The other sons were made...Christ was begotten.

...for Jon's broad brush. Surely pointing out the similarity of one's expressed notions to tenets distinctive of various cults and heresies, e.g, Mormonism, Socinianism, JWs, Nazism, etc. isn't being equated with calling one's salvation into question? For instance, if someone postulates the...

You need to keep in mind that it's a Person that saves, not a teaching. Rom 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus... We don't confess a teaching, we confess a Person. Now, are you suggesting that all the notions you entertain about that Person are free of error?

You will confess Reformed doctrine yet. :Cool