Search results

Error, hoary with age, does not make such the truth, ever. The length of time you have not believed the truth, and have believed yourself over the stated texts, does not prove (in any case) for your position to be accurate. Traditions in Romanism, likewise, are long-winded, and long-aged, as...

That is simply 'you' referring to 'you' and provided no substance for such a stance, other than 'you'. It is a circular, fallacious position, built simply on your own 'imagination' of yourself, as superior to others. A terrible complex to have.

I notice that you are "not interested" in my question. The reason is your a prioric worldview which denies the facts provided.

Of course the Son is the revelation of the Father (Jhn. 14:7; &c.), for how could it be otherwise? That is not in question. The question (you have raised) is on the eternal nature of the Son (Deity), which He always has, even before His incarnation into the fallen flesh (Rom. 8:3) of mankind...

Again, you simply do not understand koine Greek, or John's intent in Jhn. 1:1a,b, or c; and either of the Holy Spirit which inspired the texts, since you also seem to deny His (Holy Ghost's) Personage / Being as well, and therefore cannot ever acknowledge these truths until you do (Jhn. 8:24,43...

Your response is simply Incorrect in several ways, each of which is denying the plainest texts. The Son is also named JHVH (pg 69), as per many places in the OT: Gen 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; Gen 19:24 ויהוה...

I see why forums are dead these days.

Verse 1, is about God speaking to His people through prophets / messengers. Heb 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Yet in verse 5, God the Father, is speaking to His (the Father's) Son: Heb 1:5 For unto which of the...