Search results

According to a consistent, just application of the measures/standards used by KJV-only advocates to attack the NKJV, would the KJV translators be condemned for omitting "thy God" at Deuteronomy 26:1 in the 1611 edition of the KJV? David Norton wrote: "Without the evidence of Bod 1602 [the 1602...

That portion of Psalm 14 was earlier found in the 1535 Coverdale's Bible and 1539 Great Bible before it was found in the 1610 Douay Old Testament. It is also found in the Church of England's book of Psalms in its Book of Common Prayer. It is numbered Psalm 13 in the Latin Vulgate and Douay OT...

The NKJV does not omit the word "God" 51 times where the Hebrew word for "God" or the Greek word for "God" is found in the KJV's and the NKJV's underlying original-language texts of Scripture. Differing from the KJV would not prove the NKJV to be wrong. This example would demonstrate the...

You have proven no deceit and no "smear campaign" in my accurate statements. You prove no misrepresentation of your views in my posts. You improperly attack me for believing that you believe what you yourself post. It is your own assertions that demonstrate that you hold to a form of KJV-only...

Smith, Spencer. Empire of Error: An Analysis of the Teachings and Philosophies of First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana Under the Leadership of Jack Hyles. 2026. Chapter thirteen in this new book by Spencer Smith is entitled "The Heresies of Hyles." (pp. 158-185). Spencer Smith listed one...

The text of the 1602 edition of the Bishops' Bible is available online so its text can be examined and seen that it has the book of Psalms from the Great Bible. https://archive.org/details/bim_early-english-books-1641-1700_the-bible-_bible-english_1602 In checking the assertion made by Jack...

In some 1572 editions of the Bishops’ Bible, the Psalms of the Bishops' Bible were printed in parallel columns with the Psalms of the Great Bible. In some of its later editions published in 1575 and 1595, the Psalms of the Great Bible were printed in place of Bishops’ Bible’s own rendering of...

As their starting point in English or as their English foundation, the KJV translators were given copies of the 1602 edition of the Bishops' Bible. David Norton wrote: “The 1602 Bishops’ Bible frequently differs from the original 1568 text, so much so that in parts such as the Psalms it ought...

Some KJV defenders strongly object to being identified accurately as KJV-only even though they clearly have made exclusive claims for only one English Bible translation--the KJV. For one example, D. A. Waite (1927-2024) has clearly made some exclusive "only" claims for the KJV that would...

KJV-only author D. A. Waite sought to maintain that the term KJV-only should apply only to Peter Ruckman and his followers. D. A. Waite tried to suggest that the “KJV-only camp” is “the Peter Ruckman camp” (Critical Answer to Michael Sproul’s, p. 100). D. A. Waite contended that KJV-only “is a...

Your own posts demonstrate that you believe some non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning/teaching. It is your own statements that would identify your view as KJV-only. You do not apply the same exact measures/standards to the many varying editions of the KJV that you inconsistently and unjustly...

The King James Version is not a manuscript. The KJV is one English Bible translation in the same sense (univocally) as the pre-1611 English Bibles are English Bible translations. Do you try to sell people on the non-true claims for the KJV? There are many varying editions of the KJV that are...

KJV defenders David Reid and Bryan Ross wrote: “”It could not be clearer that what the Lord was doing in Luke 4:18-19 was reading from the manuscript that He held in His hands. And yet what the Lord read does not have verbatim identicality with the passage in Isaiah [Isaiah 61:1-2]. It is not...

The serious problem and alarming inadequacy with KJV-only articles and books is their dependance upon fallacies and their use of double standards as they fail to apply their exact same standards or measures that they use to accuse post-1611 English Bibles to the KJV itself. Perhaps using the...

Did the Church of England makers of the KJV arbitrarily and intentionally change the meaning of certain Bible texts in the pre-1611 English Bibles to make them more favorable to Church of England episcopal church government? Did the makers of the KJV remove vital words or phrases at Acts 14:23...

Later KJV editors changed “a hundred” (Exod. 38:9, Jud. 20:10, 1 Kings 7:2) to “an hundred” while they kept “a hundred” once (Isa. 37:36). They revised “a house” (1 Chron. 17:5) to “an house” while “a house” was left at other verses (Exod. 12:30, Lev. 14:34, etc.). They changed “a hill” (Isa...

Do you try an inexcusable, irresponsible hack job as you throw out misleading and incorrect accusations against believers who disagree with human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning/teaching? Believers who disagree with KJV-only teaching do not treat the Bible like they would any other book...

I meet Steve Combs at the National Conference for the King James Bible Research Council. I talked with him a little. I gave him a copy of one of my books. Steve Combs' first two books A Practical Theology of Bible Translating in 2019 and The Translator’s Greek Grammar of the Textus Receptus...

Many or most of the original members of the King James Bible Research Council were formerly members of the Dean Burgon Society, and they seem to have left it after a disagreement over D. A. Waite's rejection of use of the term "inspired" for the KJV.

https://craigs-theology-books.com/blog/top-10-problem-passages-for-the-king-james-bible-translation/byq0er?fbclid=IwY2xjawR-g9NleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEef4R0p4eFQVry5-QXbeqtQrVki0vioDr3yo7aV1RAzQK4nMiUiXAw0QFCeoA_aem_QlfmHThm2GL5cA049qsuSg