Search results

I guess all that means is you don't have an answer to my question. Why didn't you just say so in the first place? A phone call is not a technicality. If she wanted to make sure his written statement was uncoerced, all she had to do was place one in the last 12 months. Instead she went to...

He did. A year ago. Is that too difficult for you to grasp? If she was concerned about coersion, she could have called him anytime. But, now, all of a sudden a phone conversation is OK when a written statement isn't? Fine. If she's stupid enough to go to jail when all she had to do was...

Ok, my mistake - she was assured by her source over the phone rather than a paper waiver. A voluntary verbal waiver vs coerced paper waiver - is that a difficult concept? [/b]</font> Did she not know his phone number 3 months ago? Is that a difficult concept?

He never signed another one. But, suddenly, now it's OK to testify? :confused:

"It is really a disgrace that the liberal press refers to such enemies of liberalism as "antiwar" when in reality they are straight-out pro-war, but on the other side." The logic is so simple and dead on, I wish I had said it first.

She has known about the waiver for over a year. Why did she go to jail rather than identify her source months ago?

I don't really have any problem with a resolution that says this: "A portion of the resolution, which would express the opinion of Congress, reads: "In observance of and out of respect for the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, the House of...

Santorum appears just to be icing. The cake is Tom DeLay. They want him destroyed really bad.

Just now realized I left out the link for the above story. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/25/AR2005092501413.html For the rest of the story.

You mean besides the fact that he's a conservative Republican? "Rick Santorum (R-PA) is a second-term United States Senator, representing the people of Pennsylvania. Sen. Santorum’s ethics issues stem from the manner in which he funded his children’s education and the close timing between...

They consider themselves "mainstream". Their actions and their positioning on issues literally screams "liberal". Another liberal group trying to pass themselves off as moderates or "mainliners". Hardly new. I'm not surprised you buy into it.

Corruption in the State of Louisiana is, I believe, even more pervasive.

It's a liberal group. You would naturally expect the list to be loaded with Republicans. It is. The fact that two democrats made the list is , to me, indicative of the egregious nature of their corruption. It would be good to note who they are and remember. It is also worth noting that one...

Amen. [/b]</font> If you've seen the pictures of her "arrest", she doesn't seem to be grieving too much at the moment.

Better stick with your big SUV and 18MPG with a "cow catcher" on front. 4WD preferred. ;)

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=\Politics\archive\200509\POL20050926a.html Liberal Group Puts Two Democrats on Its 'Most Corrupt' List By Susan Jones CNSNews.com Senior Editor September 26, 2005 (CNSNews.com) - A liberal watchdog group has listed what it considers the "13 most...

Louisiana Goes After Federal Billions By Michael Grunwald and Susan B. Glasser Washington Post Staff Writers Monday, September 26, 2005; A01 Louisiana's congressional delegation has requested $40 billion for Army Corps of Engineers projects in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, about 10 times the...

Why would he? Most assistance is in the form of guaranteed loans. [/b]</font> Ya got me, but I was just trying to be fair to the guy. Truth is I'll stick with the personal enrichment angle. But we'll both have to wait till it's settled to find out the truth. Maybe he ought to sue you and me...

Why not? Everyplace else is. ;)