Search results

Are you describing your own non-scriptural position concerning English Bible translations? You do not engage in considering and debating the actual documented evidence presented that conflicts with your unproven assertions.

Your efforts to dismiss substance and evidence is the noise.

You incorrectly claim that my accurate comments do not follow because you misrepresent or twist them as saying something that I did not state. I did not claim that all the KJV's underlying text is a reconstructed text as you seem to try to suggest or imply. The truth remains that the KJV's...

I am not confusing two different categories as you incorrectly allege. I clearly and directly refer to your own assertions and statements concerning English Bible translations. Your assertions concerning English Bible translations are not consistent. I clearly noted that I consider your view...

This is what I stated, which is nothing like your attempted misrepresentation. Your response does not address and refute what I actually stated. You may not apply your undefined smear term of accusation ["reconstructed text"] consistently and justly. The KJV could be said to be based on...

Not true. Your bogus attempts to dismiss and ignore substance and evidence is a substitute for sound reasoning.

Your own stated position and posted stated claims match clearly a clear definition and explanation of the term KJV-only. As clearly explained before, KJV-only refers to your position and view of English Bible translations. You have stated your position concerning English Bibles by your...

You pointed out no actual methodological flaw. Pointing out the different views of inspiration was not noise and was not a flaw. You fail to demonstrate that your view is not being mislabeled as you used a leading KJV-only two lines of Bibles argument. Many KJV-only advocates appeal to the...

Do the Scriptures actually state and teach that words added by men are "pure words, derived from God Himself"? Do the Scriptures actually state and teach that any errors introduced by men [whether copiers, printers, or translators] are "pure words, derived from God Himself"?

Evidently KJV defenders are in discord and strongly disagree among themselves in their own understandings and interpretation of 2 Timothy 3:16 and the doctrine of inspiration. Are KJV-only advocates so fragmented and divided over the doctrine of inspiration that Phil Stringer concluded that...

Where do the Scriptures state or teach that inspiration is a quality or attribute that is transferred to post-NT Bible translations? Do any KJV defenders clearly, consistently, and soundly prove from the Scriptures the idea that inspiration is actually identified in Scripture to be a continuing...

The Scriptures are the specific revealed, written words of God given by the miracle of inspiration to the prophets and apostles. According to the Scriptures, God revealed His Word to the prophets and apostles by the Holy Spirit (Eph. 3:5, 2 Pet. 1:21, 2 Pet. 3:1-2, Rom. 15:4, 1 Cor. 2:10-13...

Phil Stringer asserted: “The verse [2 Tim. 3:16] does not say that the words that God gave are preserved, transmitted, or translated by ‘inspiration’” (Brown, Indestructible Book, p. 394). D. A. Waite contended: “There is no scriptural proof that any translation of God’s Words is inspired of...

You fail to prove your hateful opinions to be true. The leftist or progressive brand of "Christianity" emphasizes HATE [hatred of President Donald Trump and voters who elected him and especially hatred of Bible-believing Christians]. Democrat socialism is much more likely to destroy democracy...

Scriptures does not limit the authority of God's Word to having to be translated only into Early Modern English, and not into present standard Modern English. The Scriptures do not suggest that the word of God is bound or limited to the textual criticism decisions, Bible revision decisions...

According to the Scriptures themselves, it could be soundly concluded that inspiration would be a term for the way, method, means, or process by which God directly gave the Scriptures to the prophets and apostles or for the way that the words proceeded from the mouth of God to the prophets and...

Do some accept and hold their KJV-only teaching first and then later interpret verses such as 2 Timothy 3:16 and Job 32:8 to conform them to their already accepted view? Do these two verses (2 Timothy 3:16 and Job 32:8) use the same original-language word in the same exact sense concerning the...

The Scriptures are the specific revealed, written words of God given by the miracle of inspiration to the prophets and apostles. According to the Scriptures, God revealed His Word to the prophets and apostles by the Holy Spirit (Eph. 3:5, 2 Pet. 1:21, 2 Pet. 3:1-2, Rom. 15:4, 1 Cor. 2:10-13...

anti-working class Democrat operatives https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/obama-operative-turned-trump-voter-exposes-the-anti-working-class-bigotry-that-destroyed-the-democrats/ar-AA2c3nws?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6aa4a68ca1014721b797401064919ab2&ei=15...

This preserved textual stream argument is a typical, leading KJV-only claim. What you mean by preserved text only is basically the same as what KJV-only authors mean. In his tract entitled "Are your Bible's Roots Trustworthy," G. Grady Daniel, Jr. used the "two lines of manuscripts" argument...