Search results

Did the Church of England makers of the KJV arbitrarily and intentionally change the meaning of certain Bible texts in the pre-1611 English Bibles to make them more favorable to Church of England episcopal church government? Did the makers of the KJV remove vital words or phrases at Acts 14:23...

Later KJV editors changed “a hundred” (Exod. 38:9, Jud. 20:10, 1 Kings 7:2) to “an hundred” while they kept “a hundred” once (Isa. 37:36). They revised “a house” (1 Chron. 17:5) to “an house” while “a house” was left at other verses (Exod. 12:30, Lev. 14:34, etc.). They changed “a hill” (Isa...

Do you try an inexcusable, irresponsible hack job as you throw out misleading and incorrect accusations against believers who disagree with human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning/teaching? Believers who disagree with KJV-only teaching do not treat the Bible like they would any other book...

I meet Steve Combs at the National Conference for the King James Bible Research Council. I talked with him a little. I gave him a copy of one of my books. Steve Combs' first two books A Practical Theology of Bible Translating in 2019 and The Translator’s Greek Grammar of the Textus Receptus...

Many or most of the original members of the King James Bible Research Council were formerly members of the Dean Burgon Society, and they seem to have left it after a disagreement over D. A. Waite's rejection of use of the term "inspired" for the KJV.

https://craigs-theology-books.com/blog/top-10-problem-passages-for-the-king-james-bible-translation/byq0er?fbclid=IwY2xjawR-g9NleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEef4R0p4eFQVry5-QXbeqtQrVki0vioDr3yo7aV1RAzQK4nMiUiXAw0QFCeoA_aem_QlfmHThm2GL5cA049qsuSg

A great majority of post-1900 KJV editions are generally based on the 1769 Oxford KJV edition. Only a few KJV editions printed around the year 2000 by Zondervan for a few years and a few more printed around 2005 by Hendrickson for a few years were based on the 1873 Cambridge. This entire 1873...

Most post-1900 or present Cambridge KJV editions follow the 1873 Cambridge correction at 1 Samuel 2:13 [“priests’ custom”] since the Hebrew noun translated priests here was plural in number. They may also be following the 1873 Cambridge edition in departing from over twenty spellings of proper...

It was the 1762 Cambridge that was considered a standard although the 1743 Cambridge edition actually introduced most of the renderings credited to the 1762. The 1769 Oxford was considered the standard, not the 1769 Cambridge which had some but not all the changes introduced in the 1769 Oxford...