Search results

Think paul point there is that the Jews who are really heirs to Abraham father of faith would be the ones who received Jesus as their promised messiah, thus spiritual jews of the promise

Charismatics would be normally though the ones to get into heretical movement, such as dominion, word of faith, kingdom now etc

And it not Covenant theology either

When any of us act like that, we really are highlighting to others 'what jesus would NOT do"

There is the so called universal Church, all of the saved and redeemed of all time, and those living in the visible body of Chris there on earth

Would tend to separate those 2 groups, as the classic Pentecostals such as AOG would still hold to second act of grace as evidence by speaking in others tongues, but o n the whole they would reject physical healing in the atonement, modern day prophets and apostles, word of faith, as that pretty...

Yes, the weakest part of his other excellent ST is in the area of the Holy Spirit and s

Point is there is N O scriptures to indication slain by the Spirit as practiced in Charismatic churches is a biblical concept

That view would be heresy of baptismal regeneration though

Remember when Eunuched asked Phillipe what hindered him from being now water baptized, and he then confessed Jesus as His savior and Lord, right there believers baptism

Agreed, as taking a single verse out of context has given to us "ham was cursed" to having cults like mormons denying black were equals in status , or denying "mixed marriages" down South

Cannot believe you went here from the truth of the errors in Pentecostalism to equate that with KJVO position as the main explanation

Just to many husbands have used that logic of being "bosses" to excuse verbal and physical abuse past 2000 years

One of the most misunderstood verse in entire bible

The wife is called by God to honor and respect her husband and his authority, BUIT, the Husband is commanded to be worthy of that, to treat her as Christ does His own Church

Supralapsarianism ("above/before the fall") and Infralapsarianism ("after/below the fall") are two Calvinist views on the logical order of God’s eternal decrees. Supra holds that God decreed election before permitting the fall, while Infra posits God decreed election after decreeing the fall...

What did you think of the critique though?

1 Corinthians 2:14 the Holy Spirit disagrees with you But a natural man receives not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot know them, because they are spiritually judged

And yet Adam still was to blame for what He chose to do

John was filled with the Spirit while in his mothers womb, as being the prophesied one to come and go before the Lord