Search results

An Evaluation of the NT Textual Criticism part 14. For those who are interested. https://www.youtube.com/live/TFlTOAlXuqs?si=axqeDAi9gy0jRhGF

Corrupted is a scholars way of saying it has a mistake. All manuscripts and Bibles have at least a few mistakes in them. Some more than others. But even the 1611 KJV had a few printing errors. As far as Kurt Aland goes he was a New Testament scholar not an Old Testament scholar. He had "at...

The thought was that the Letter to Ephesians was also meant for other neighboring areas, that Paul's secretary could write the cities name in. I am convinced the original was to Ephesians and the very few blanks maybe a scribe saw one of those. I have forgotten which manuscripts lack "to the...

Here are many reformation and historic Bibles that can be viewed in the original. https://bibles-online.net/

https://bibles-online.net/flippingbook/1535/1066/ Coverdale should read "Knowe ye not that the..."

https://textusreceptusbibles.com/

They were there to help the reader. A lot are more literal translations. Remember what the 1611 Translators wrote in their preface. https://www.bible-researcher.com/kjvpref.html ." They that are wise, had rather have their judgments at liberty in differences of readings, than to be captivated...

https://archive.org/details/partofrheimsinma00carlrich/page/n3/mode/2up

https://en.literaturabautista.com/exhaustive-listing-marginal-notes-1611-edition-king-james-bible

Yes, it wasn't in the Textus Receptus edition that they used. In fact the words "of thee" are missing from Stephanus and Erasmus editions of the Textus Receptus. I believe it was imported from the Latin by Beza.

The NKJV never departs from a Textus Receptus. They certainly used an edition slightly different than the many different ones used by the KJV translators. But they all follow Erasmuses 5th edition, all with slight differences. Stephanus, Beza, Erasmus, so on and so forth...

Don't all of the manuscripts have "according to Matthew " or "according to Mark" and so forth? I doubt there is one manuscript that does not have "according to....".

Thanks for the information! Yet no manuscript is anywhere near as old as Irenaeus in the 2nd century. So the Long ending of Mark was known, in Gaul of all places in the 2nd century. If it was known to Irenaeus in Gaul, it was in many Greek Manuscripts back then . That explains why it is in...

Irenaeus in the 2nd century is the oldest testimony to Mark 16:9-20.

Very informative.

What's up with the Washington Post? They were Trump's enemies in the Past? Why the change? Jeff Bezos and Donald Trump joing forces over war or something? Why would the Washington Post all of a sudden tell the truth? After so many lies, many about Trump?

Did anyone mention the fact that Muslim voters, especially in States like Michigan abandoned Harris because of the Genocide in Palenstine? Israel? Many other leftist voters did the same.

The Trinitarian Bible Society has some large and giant print KJV Bibles at more than fair prices. https://us.tbsbibles.org/page/store/

New Testament Textual Criticism: The Case for Byzantine Priority Maurice A. Robinson Robinson, The case for Byzantine priority

The ungodly men deny God and the Lord Jesus Christ both.