‘She’s A Liability’: Republicans Intend To Oust Liz Cheney From House Leadership By Month’s End, Rep

[Baptist Believer]

False that laws were not followed? HAHAHHAHHAAHHAAHAHAHA Legislatures set voting policy and procedure not unelected officials. The election process was changed by people who had no authority to change it so NO laws WERE NOT followed and that is a fact.

Three words: "State of Emergency"

Local officials had the authority to make changes because of the ongoing health emergency. President Trump declared the emergency, as well as the individual states. Therefore, the laws you cite are irrelevant in that situation.

 

[Reformed1689]

Three words: "State of Emergency"

Local officials had the authority to make changes because of the ongoing health emergency. President Trump declared the emergency, as well as the individual states. Therefore, the laws you cite are irrelevant in that situation.

No, that is not something State of Emergency allows them to do. They don't get to change election laws AND that was not necessary per the CDC. Try again.

 

[Baptist Believer]

Tax evasion? Proof?
Fraud in obtaining loans? Proof?
Campaign finance violations for Trump? Proof?
Coerce election fraud? Proof?
Perjury? Proof?
Obstruction has been debunked over and over, not even going to entertain that one.
Dfraud the US? Proof?
Money Laundering? Proof?
Brive foreign officials? Proof?
Attack congress? Proof?

I'll send you a tin foil hat for your birthday....

• The charges for campaign finance violations have already been proven. Trump is referenced in the indictment.
• The evidence for tax evasion seems quite clear, given the public record. Now that prosecutors finally have access to his tax materials, they can verify whether or not he violated tax laws. If he didn't, then he may be guilty of presenting false tax information in court during the lawsuit with his niece.
• Coercion of election fraud has strong evidence with the publicized recording of the phone call to the Georgia Secretary of State, and other calls that the government prosecutors undoubtedly have.
• Bribery of foreign officials seems rather straightforward, since we also have a phone call memo that the "read the transcript" people don't seem to have read.
• The charges of inciting an attack on Congress are obvious, since he made numerous statements claiming fraud, and then organized a rally and incited the crowd to go down to the Capitol "with him" (which was a lie). He didn't call off the attack until hours later, when he finally told the mob that he loved them.

I could go on, but you are committed to not believing it, so I'll stop wasting my time.

Let's wait and see who is correct.

 

[Baptist Believer]

No, that is not something State of Emergency allows them to do. They don't get to change election laws AND that was not necessary per the CDC. Try again.

Just because you say that doesn't mean it is true. You won't be convinced by any evidence that doesn't affirm your view, so I'm not going to waste my time.

 

[Reformed1689]

• The charges for campaign finance violations have already been proven. Trump is referenced in the indictment.
• The evidence for tax evasion seems quite clear, given the public record. Now that prosecutors finally have access to his tax materials, they can verify whether or not he violated tax laws. If he didn't, then he may be guilty of presenting false tax information in court during the lawsuit with his niece.
• Coercion of election fraud has strong evidence with the publicized recording of the phone call to the Georgia Secretary of State, and other calls that the government prosecutors undoubtedly have.
• Bribery of foreign officials seems rather straightforward, since we also have a phone call memo that the "read the transcript" people don't seem to have read.
• The charges of inciting an attack on Congress are obvious, since he made numerous statements claiming fraud, and then organized a rally and incited the crowd to go down to the Capitol "with him" (which was a lie). He didn't call off the attack until hours later, when he finally told the mob that he loved them.

I could go on, but you are committed to not believing it, so I'll stop wasting my time.

Let's wait and see who is correct.

Referenced is not the same as guilt.
Again, proof of tax evasion or just a hung/accusation?
Coercion? Please provide the quote that proves this.
What bribery? Please provide exact reference.
Nobody who is honest actually believes he incited what happened on January 6th. And your statement is FULL of lies and bias.

 

[Reformed1689]

Just because you say that doesn't mean it is true. You won't be convinced by any evidence that doesn't affirm your view, so I'm not going to waste my time.

Show me in the Constitution where it allows for such action? It doesn't.

 

[777]

Good, hope this RINO is gone by the end of the month. She didn't even deserve a "leadership" position in the first place, the GOP is no stranger to nepotism I guess. Deep state uniparty plant, no wonder those hacks on PMSNBC and Pelosi like her.

The state of Wyoming made a big mistake electing her, I can tell you the Bush-Cheney-Romney wing of the GOP is over. Liz ought to switch parties and run in a machine state, then she'd win again.

 

[Reformed1689]

Just because you say that doesn't mean it is true. You won't be convinced by any evidence that doesn't affirm your view, so I'm not going to waste my time.

As a conservative I still believe the Constitution means something, I know liberal Democrats as you seem to be do not.

 

[Baptist Believer]

Nobody who is honest actually believes he incited what happened on January 6th.

'Only dishonest people disagree with me!'

And your statement is FULL of lies and bias.

'Your father is a hamster, and your mother smells of elderberries!'

Show me in the Constitution where it allows for such action? It doesn't.

It actually says nothing about election law in the states. That's for the states to decide.

As a conservative...

I don't think you are. You come across as a populist reactionary.

...I still believe the Constitution means something...

Do you?

Did you object when former President Trump claimed that Article II of the Constitution lets him do anything he wants? A person who believes the Constitution (and has read it) would have had a fit. Did you do that? Did you also get upset every time Trump violated the separation of powers, or used Executive Orders to push his agenda instead of going through the Constitutional process for making laws? I did. Did you?

If you didn't, you don't believe it.

I know liberal Democrats as you...

False. Not a liberal nor a Democrat.

...seem to be do not.

False.

I have both read and studied the Constitution. I also believe deeply in it and think it is generally and outstanding document and guide for our nation. That's one of the reasons I could not support Trump.

 

[AustinC]

Trumpists are a liability to the Republican Party. Mainstream America views them as fascist racists who support a bully who represents self-interest. As long as Trump is the poster child for the Republican Party, the Party will be impotent in effecting any change.
Look at the present situation...a person with full on dementia was elected above Trump. That tells you all you need to know about how bad Trump is viewed by the majority of society.

 

[Reformed1689]

It actually says nothing about election law in the states. That's for the states to decide.

Article 1, Section 4.

 

[Reformed1689]

Did you object when former President Trump claimed that Article II of the Constitution lets him do anything he wants? A person who believes the Constitution (and has read it) would have had a fit. Did you do that? Did you also get upset every time Trump violated the separation of powers, or used Executive Orders to push his agenda instead of going through the Constitutional process for making laws? I did. Did you?

I hate executive orders in general. President's have no such authority. And if Trump said that, I am not aware of it, yes, that is wrong.

 

[Reformed1689]

I have both read and studied the Constitution. I also believe deeply in it and think it is generally and outstanding document and guide for our nation. That's one of the reasons I could not support Trump.

You clearly have not read it closely.

 

[Reformed1689]

Look at the present situation...a person with full on dementia was elected above Trump.

And they had to usurp the Constitution to do so....

 

[Reformed1689]

That tells you all you need to know about how bad Trump is viewed by the majority of society.

No it doesn't. They had to change the rules (illegally) in order to accomplish what they did.

 

[Salty]

...The state of Wyoming made a big mistake electing her, I can tell you the Bush-Cheney-Romney wing of the GOP is over. Liz ought to switch parties and run in a machine state, then she'd win again.

In 2020, Liz won the nomination with 73% of the vote
in 2020 Liz won the election with 68% of the vote. (four candidates)

Liz Cheney - Wikipedia

 

[777]

Yes, but that's my point - the neocon was just elected to the House in 2016 and within two years, she's the third most powerful Republican in the House.

That's on the national level but Charles Manson could have been elected to the House by Wyoming if he had run as a Republican. The left aren't the only ones that vote in lockstep.

Her approval rating in her home state is under twenty percent, Trump's among the GOP is over ninety. Typical RINO, she goes out of her way to chastise Trump and his supporters but never says a word about "them".

 

[AustinC]

No it doesn't. They had to change the rules (illegally) in order to accomplish what they did.

You are clinging to an empty conspiracy theory. God has removed Donald Trump and even pagans knew he was a corrupt man. I believe he will never be President again.

 

[Salty]

You are clinging to an empty conspiracy theory. God has removed Donald Trump and even pagans knew he was a corrupt man. I believe he will never be President again.

Normally, never say never!
So if you are saying that God removed Trump
then you must believe that God put Trump into the White House.

 

[Reformed1689]

You are clinging to an empty conspiracy theory. God has removed Donald Trump and even pagans knew he was a corrupt man. I believe he will never be President again.

What "conspiracy" theory? Are you honestly saying election processes were not altered by unelected people and not the legislatures? Because that isn't conspiracy, that is fact.