Actually it proves you are not as familiar with Calvinists as you seem to profess my friend. Calvinist Baptists have always taken the interpretation of "non Calvinistic" Arminian commentators such as Menno Simmons, Michael Sattler, John Smyth, Thomas Helwys on the subject of Baptism and the Doctrine of the Church, Separation of Church and State, (Since Baptist Ecclesiology has roots with the Anabaptists and General Baptists , though ultimately scriptureFirst time I've seen a Calvinist that rather take that the interpretation of a "non Calvinistic" commentator over a "Calvinistic" one.
Proves they'll take whatever interpretation serves their purpose at the moment
