Ehud said:
C4k If you truly believed this then you would have corrected Keith M.when he said about 1Tim 3:16
Keith M this was your reply about 1tim3:16 It sounds like Keith M is intolerant. Hey Keith cannot they both be right like you said about 1 Tim 3:16
Keith jumps on band wagons of circular reasoning. Forgive him
And C4k You did not take Keith to task Shame on you both.:tonofbricks:
Talk about motive.
EHUD & CO.
Ehud, you are taking something I said completely out of context to make a false point. When I said both were right, I was talking about the English translations of two different texts. In that case, both English translations
were correct in that they correctly translated their respective underlying Greek texts.
However, in this case we're not talking about English translations of two separate texts, but two differing English renderings of the same text. Since the two English renderings are from different KJVs and since they do not agree, one must be right and the other wrong. We're not talking about another situation where differing texts were rendered a little differently, but in this case the
same text was rendered differently.
There is nothing in what I said to be ashamed of as you falsely claim, Ehud. If you can't see the difference in the two situations, then the fault is in your own ignorance and misunderstanding - not in anything I said.
Ehud, which rendering is correct? The 1611 or the 1769? Now don't forget we're talking about differing renderings of the same text here, not differing texts.
