• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

1st Corinthians 3 and Carnality

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not to be picky, but it's a verb.

Heb. 10:14, NKJV. 'For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified.'
The verb is Present Tense, signifying continuous action. Certainly in some verses (eg. Heb. 10:10) it refers to a completed work, but not always q.e.d.

The context defines that it is a forever completed action, and whether we can see continuity in that completed action goes without saying, seeing that what is in view, that we have been made complete in regards to remission of sins will never change.

This is perhaps the most complete (no pun intended) passage that we can go to in understanding the Security of the Believer, and the Sovereignty of God in regards to remission of sins. This perfection, completion, was accomplished by Christ alone, and it is contrasted with what was incomplete, which is the Law.


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Darrell,

Again, you missed two items.

One, the Scriptures teach the believer is to mature in Christ, to grow up. In that matter we agree.

However, the Scriptures do not even come close to the definition of sanctification being used as progressive. Again, growing up does not make one more holy. It makes one more able to understand the mysteries of God, the enemies plotting, and the character of living. The believer is sanctified - Holy. It is THE ONLY use found in Scriptures. There is NEVER a time when sanctification is aligned with any "progression" or steps to making one more holy.

Perhaps the greatest gauge given showing the steps to maturity is found in 2 Peter. Through out that list of building blocks, there is never a time when "sanctification" is the issue. It is a progress of maturity, of growing up.

HUMANS have attached "progressive" to sanctification, and it is a wrong application of the words.

I am NOT arguing about the teaching, I am arguing about the term used.

Second, I posted the note about the format of your posts not to bolster your ego. I could care less about that.

I posted so that more understanding and insight could be gathered by the readers from what you wrote. That is, after all, why writers write. For their readers.

HOW you write is as important as what you write. If the readers, in wadding through the format, loose the importance of the point you are making, the writing is worthless. It may contain great wisdom, but if the communication is missing, it is nothing but a irritating gong as Paul might say.

It is up to you. If you want the readers to be able to gather the information you post, then put it in a format that will allow them to do so.

I gave suggestions not to be critical, but to encourage.

However, your boasting of forums, friends, and such gives me enough insight to realize you probably will ignore this advice.

So take both points as you desire, but I offer them to you to consider.

Address the points and Scripture.

It is clear you want to argue, whereas I am simply looking for discussion and debate. As I said, there is no argument here, Progressive Sanctification is simply a Bible Basic, so trying to redefine it and obscure you rejection of it is just wasting time.

This is not boast, and my ego can only be improved, lol, if you actually learn something from the exchange.

How I post is my own business, and you are welcome not to read if you dislike my format. But instead of trying to obscure the focus with trivial matter...

...address the Scripture and points made.


God bless.
 
Top