37818
Well-Known Member
By saying that life comes from non-life just throws a man-made philosophy that is desired to be proven into an otherwise true statement.
To 'prove' 'non'-life as the origin of life, 'non' is simply inserted into the true statement, "life comes from life", and the lie, "life comes from 'non'-life" is invented.
'Non' is the man-made philosophy required to be added to an otherwise true statement, however by logic and observation, the resulting man-made philosophy is not only not proven, it is a total invention at face value that proves it to be a lie.
+1 does not equal -1+1.
'Life +1' does not come from 'non -1 life +1'.
Lies are man-made philosophies that are also false man-made philosophies.
Adding the man-made philosophy 'everyone' to an otherwise true statement that "If Christ had not paid the sins...,
no one can know Christ paid one's own sins",
may make that true statement a lie, and by adding it does not make that new statement when 'everyone' is placed into it, true.
It is simply an invention, adding a philosophy in an attempt to prove something, in a way that is fake, disingenuous, and false on it's surface.
Again, this statement without 'everyone' added is true.
"The fact that one can know Christ paid one's own sins, is proof Christ paid ....sins."
That statement can not be assumed to remain true simply by adding into it a desired result.
You'd be just as well off by trying to say, "The fact that one can know Christ paid one's own sins, is proof Christ paid for everyone's life to come from a rock."
Just because paper will sit and let you write things on it doesn't make them true.
"Everyone" is a man-made philosophy attempting to be added to otherwise true statements, as if to prove that the truth of those statements would still remain self-evident, and that eventuality could certainly never be granted, without question.
The fact that Christ died for any one person's sin, can be perfectly known by that one person, with absolute assurance, that they are saved forever, with the total number of people and their sins Christ died for, whether for just that one, or more than one, being irrelevant.
The fact that Christ died for their sin can be known by one or any number of people, with the total number of people and their sins that Christ must have died for to include all people without exception is not necessary.
The fact that Christ died for their sin can be known by one or any number of people, when the Holy Spirit bears witness with the saved person's spirit that they are a child of God.
...
Knowing you, 37, there must be something having to do with what you would say is the way a person is said to be saved, in the first place, for there to be some necessity you have for insisting Jesus died for 'everyone' in order for that to be a part of the appeal to lost sinners and the prospect of them them being able to come to know that they think they are saved(?)
What would that be, if so?
If one believes Christ paid for ones sins, it will be because that is what one understands Holy Scriptures to teach.
So if one really thinks Christ did not pay this for everyone, how is one to know one's self was not excluded?
By not really believing that.
Titus 1:2.
1 John 2:2.
1 John 5:9-13.