3rd Shot

[Wingman68]

Covid-19 Injections Increase Risk of Death Due to Covid-19 for Under 50’s by up to 177.5% According to Public Health England Data
AUGUST 15, 2021 ALGORA BLOG LEAVE A COMMENT

Spread the Word



via Daily Expose UK

Covid-19 has disproportionately affected the elderly and vulnerable with other underlying conditions, and data shows that the risk of death due to Covid-19 ranges from miniscule to negligible for the under 50’s prior to the availability of a Covid-19 injection. This makes the latest Public Health England data on Covid-19 extremely concerning, because it shows the risk of death for people under the age of 50 due to Covid-19 increases if they have been fully vaccinated.

Public Health England have been periodically releasing a report on Covid-19 variants of concern in the United Kingdom, and their latest report was released on the 6th August covering data on cases, hospitalisations, and deaths due to the Delta Covid-19 variant from the 1st February up to the 2nd August 2021.

Table 5 of the report shows that within this time frame there have been 147,612 alleged confirmed cases of the Delta Covid-19 variant in the unvaccinated group of under 50’s, and 25,536 confirmed cases of the Delta variant in the fully vaccinated group of under 50’s.

The report also shows that in the same time frame 2,290 unvaccinated people under the age of 50 have presented to emergency care resulting in overnight inpatient admission, whilst 224 fully vaccinated people under the age of 50 have presented to emergency care resulting in overnight patient admission. However this data includes people who had a Covid-19 positive sample taken upon admission to hospital.

PHE’s report also shows that 48 unvaccinated people under the age of 50 have allegedly died due to Covid-19 since the 1st February up to the 2nd August 2021, whilst 13 fully vaccinated people under the age of 50 have allegedly died due to Covid-19 in the same time frame.

At first glance these numbers may make you believe that the Covid-19 injections are working, but when you analyse the number of deaths against the number of hospitalisations and cases in each group they tell a completely different story.

Out of 147,612 alleged confirmed cases of the Delta Covid-19 variant in the unvaccinated group of under 50’s there have been 48 deaths. This equates to 0.03% of all cases in the unvaccinated under 50’s resulting in death.

However, out of 25,536 confirmed cases of the Delta variant in the fully vaccinated group of under 50’s there have been 13 deaths. This equates to 0.05% of all cases in the fully vaccinated under 50’s resulting in death.

That means the relative risk of death due to Covid-19, if under the age of 50, fully vaccinated, and then infected with Covid-19, increases by 66.66%. Not the 95% claimed by the Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers, the Government, and the scientisists it employs. But the risk of death is actually even worse for those unlucky enough to end up in hospital.

Out of 2,290 unvaccinated people under the age of 50 who have presented to emergency care resulting in overnight inpatient admission, there have been 48 deaths. This equates to 2.09% of all hospitalisations in the unvaccinated under 50’s resulting in death.

However, out of 224 fully vaccinated people under the age of 50 who have presented to emergency care resulting in overnight patient admission, their have been 13 deaths. This equated to 5.8% of all hospitalisations in the fully vaccinated under 50’s resulting in death.

This means the relative risk of death due to Covid-19, if under the age of 50, fully vaccinated, and then hospitalised with Covid-19 increases by 177.5%.

Some of you may argue that the fact the hospitalisations include those who have a positive sample taken after being admitted to hospital, makes the data unreliable. Luckily, Public Health England also provide us with the data on hospital admissions that excludes those who had not tested positive prior to admission to hospital.

Out of 1,443 unvaccinated people under the age of 50 who have presented to emergency care resulting in overnight inpatient admission, there have been 48 deaths. This equates to 3.3% of all hospitalisations in the unvaccinated under 50’s resulting in death.

However, out of 153 fully vaccinated people under the age of 50 who have presented to emergency care resulting in overnight patient admission, their have been 13 deaths. This equated to 8.5% of all hospitalisations in the fully vaccinated under 50’s resulting in death.

This means the relative risk of death due to Covid-19, if under the age of 50, fully vaccinated, and then hospitalised with Covid-19 increases by 157.5%.

Whichever way you look at it the data shows that the Covid-19 injections are increasing the risk of death due to Covid-19 in people under 50 by a significant amount.

SHARE THIS:

 

[nonaeroterraqueous]

So what you are missing is that cells are replaced. As damage to a cell occurs (by a virus, by a vacvine, by radiation ...whatever) four thing can happen- nothing, the cell repairs itself perfectly, the cell repairs itself imperfectly, or the cell dies and is (in the case of muscle cells) replaced.

No, that's not quite right. When the killer T-cells attack the vaccine-infected cells, the cells die. There's never anything left to repair. When the complimentary system attacks the cell, it dies.

You're also wrong to assert with simplicity that the cells are replaced. As I said earlier, most cell types are never replaced when destroyed. Muscle cells are replaced by scar tissue, only. Having said that, knowing that what we inject is targeting and killing our own tissues, I think it worth knowing which cells typically are destroyed by this vaccine.

A pharmicokinetics study was not actually done prior to the emergency release of the vaccine, but we do know that the vaccines infect and destroy endothelial cells. This effect results in the coagulation that we have seen killing some vaccinees. We also know, now, that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which use lipid nanoparticles, tend to accumulate in the liver, inducing inflammation there (at least liver cells can regenerate, but as sufferers of cirrhosis can attest this doesn't make it bullet-proof). In animal studies, higher doses and repeated doses tended to kill the test animals through liver damage. We also know that the lipid nanoparticle material, itself, concentrates in ovaries and adrenal glands, but we don't know if the vaccine gets there.

Muscle cells are not usually the primary target, because the lipid nanoparticles are swiftly transported into the circulatory system across the endothelium (and back again):

However, there have been incidents reported in VAERS where the vaccination resulted in intense highly localized swelling at the site of the injection, about the size of an egg, which later left a crater in its place (the affected muscle cells were permanently destroyed). We might surmise that this level of destruction exists in all vaccinees, but that the destruction is spread throughout the body in most cases.

To assume, as you say, that the cells heal is false. Cells heal of many things, but no no cell heals from the attack of a killer T-cell. The white blood cells eat the cells infected by the vaccine. To assume that the cells are replaced is false. Skin cells and gametes are constantly replaced; liver cells can be replaced if destroyed. Most cells are not replaced. The vaccine is swiftly transported into the circulatory system, and the spike proteins are a vascular toxin. This means that wherever the circulatory system is damaged and destroyed, the affected organs will be, also. Most of these organs will never regain whatever function is lost, because they cannot regrow cells.

 

[JonC]

No, that's not quite right. When the killer T-cells attack the vaccine-infected cells, the cells die. There's never anything left to repair. When the complimentary system attacks the cell, it dies.

You're also wrong to assert with simplicity that the cells are replaced. As I said earlier, most cell types are never replaced when destroyed. Muscle cells are replaced by scar tissue, only. Having said that, knowing that what we inject is targeting and killing our own tissues, I think it worth knowing which cells typically are destroyed by this vaccine.

A pharmicokinetics study was not actually done prior to the emergency release of the vaccine, but we do know that the vaccines infect and destroy endothelial cells. This effect results in the coagulation that we have seen killing some vaccinees. We also know, now, that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which use lipid nanoparticles, tend to accumulate in the liver, inducing inflammation there (at least liver cells can regenerate, but as sufferers of cirrhosis can attest this doesn't make it bullet-proof). In animal studies, higher doses and repeated doses tended to kill the test animals through liver damage. We also know that the lipid nanoparticle material, itself, concentrates in ovaries and adrenal glands, but we don't know if the vaccine gets there.

Muscle cells are not usually the primary target, because the lipid nanoparticles are swiftly transported into the circulatory system across the endothelium (and back again):
View attachment 5100
However, there have been incidents reported in VAERS where the vaccination resulted in intense highly localized swelling at the site of the injection, about the size of an egg, which later left a crater in its place (the affected muscle cells were permanently destroyed). We might surmise that this level of destruction exists in all vaccinees, but that the destruction is spread throughout the body in most cases.

To assume, as you say, that the cells heal is false. Cells heal of many things, but no no cell heals from the attack of a killer T-cell. The white blood cells eat the cells infected by the vaccine. To assume that the cells are replaced is false. Skin cells and gametes are constantly replaced; liver cells can be replaced if destroyed. Most cells are not replaced. The vaccine is swiftly transported into the circulatory system, and the spike proteins are a vascular toxin. This means that wherever the circulatory system is damaged and destroyed, the affected organs will be, also. Most of these organs will never regain whatever function is lost, because they cannot regrow cells.

Re-read my post. If we could not "regrow" cells then we would not live. The mRNA affects muscle cells (affected cells die). There is no circulatory damage from mRNA or the spike protein. The protein (not the vaccine) makes it to the circulatory system.

But if I am wrong (and the vaccine is not IM) then it is even better news because the cells in the circulatory system are produced daily.

Where did you get the idea cells are not replaced?

 

[nonaeroterraqueous]

Where did you get the idea cells are not replaced?

A number of places, the first of which is my pathology textbook. The entire idea behind stem cell research is an effort to deal with this problem. The differentiated cells of most tissues can only be replaced by undifferentiated cells (ie. stem cells), which don't exist in most tissues. Hence, cell replacement is impossible for most tissue types.

Re-read my post. If we could not "regrow" cells then we would not live.

Then you're dead. I don't need to re-read your post.

The mRNA affects muscle cells (affected cells die).

mRNA in lipid nanoparticles goes wherever the nanoparticles go. Pharmicokinetic studies on nanoparticles containing luciferase mRNA (performed after the public release of the vaccine) showed immediate uptake into the circulatory system of the nanoparticles. It was previously assumed that the vaccine would stay in the muscle. It does not.

There is no circulatory damage from mRNA or the spike protein.

The Salk institute already determined that the spike protein is a vascular toxin all by itself. The mRNA is lethal to whatever it infects, and when that host happens to be vascular, then the mRNA is a vascular pathogen.

The protein (not the vaccine) makes it to the circulatory system.

The pharmicokinetics studies prove otherwise. The study was even performed by Pfizer. You can find it here:
pfizer-confidential-translated : Michael Palmer : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
By the way, if not for the rush of Operation Warp Speed, this shot never could have been approved for use so far in advance of this study. Every pharmaceutical must have this research prior to approval.

But if I am wrong (and the vaccine is not IM) then it is even better news because the cells in the circulatory system are produced daily.

You are wrong. You're even wrong about it being good news. I think this must be the first time I've ever seen someone declare that it was good to know that his circulatory system was damaged.

 

[JonC]

A number of places, the first of which is my pathology textbook. The entire idea behind stem cell research is an effort to deal with this problem. The differentiated cells of most tissues can only be replaced by undifferentiated cells (ie. stem cells), which don't exist in most tissues. Hence, cell replacement is impossible for most tissue types.



Then you're dead. I don't need to re-read your post.



mRNA in lipid nanoparticles goes wherever the nanoparticles go. Pharmicokinetic studies on nanoparticles containing luciferase mRNA (performed after the public release of the vaccine) showed immediate uptake into the circulatory system of the nanoparticles. It was previously assumed that the vaccine would stay in the muscle. It does not.



The Salk institute already determined that the spike protein is a vascular toxin all by itself. The mRNA is lethal to whatever it infects, and when that host happens to be vascular, then the mRNA is a vascular pathogen.



The pharmicokinetics studies prove otherwise. The study was even performed by Pfizer. You can find it here:
pfizer-confidential-translated : Michael Palmer : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
By the way, if not for the rush of Operation Warp Speed, this shot never could have been approved for use so far in advance of this study. Every pharmaceutical must have this research prior to approval.



You are wrong. You're even wrong about it being good news. I think this must be the first time I've ever seen someone declare that it was good to know that his circulatory system was damaged.

So, to be clear (to make sure I am not misunderstanding you) you are claiming that we have a certain number of myocytes (these smooth muscle cells that are affected by the vaccine) and that once these cells die that is it....no more can be produced? And you ate suggesting that these vaccines destroy a dangerous number of these cells (although less than the actual virus)?

I have to ask....since these cells live for 10-14 years, how is it that we have people alive today who are over 14 years old (presumably with at least a few muscle cells in their body)?