BobRyan
Well-Known Member
Obviously I HAVE constructed a timeline BASED on the events IN text -- and you have constructed one that you "splice and slice" and then stop as soon as it gets to even ONE messianic event MENTIONED in the text!Originally posted by Pastor Larry:
[QB] Bob,
Just a quick read shows that you still haven't read the passage carefully, you still haven't constructed a time line based on the passage
How wrong is that???!
I can't believe you could have ever come to believe such a thing.
In fact I did. I SHOWED that the term Messiah is "the Annointed one" and I ALSO SHOW that it is the APPEARING of the MESSIAH that happens ON the 483 year boundry., you still have not identified the baptism in the passage,
You have nothing what-so-ever happening ON That 483 year deadline EVEN though the text points DIRECTLY to it and saying that FROM the start UNTIL the very point in time that the Messiah appears - is exactly 483 years!!
You miss it entirely - and I get it right on the money!
How sad that you pretend not to notice that glaring flaw in your timeline.
THEN - the NEXT thing IN The timeline IN the text is the Messiah being "cut off" something that happens in the week AFTER the 69th week. Something I GET 100% - right on the money.
Something that you ignore ENTIRELY in your timeline - but must slice and splice your timeline to get to such a wrong conclusion because you can't get there exegetically - naturally by PRESERVING the timeline!!
And you think that is "compelling"?????
Hardly! I point out that vs 26 has "THE MESSIAH" and "THE PEOPLE of the prince". You land on "THE PRINCE" as if he is an actor in vs 26 -- when clearly "he is not".and you plainly ignore the mention of the "prince who is to come"
You latch onto the "prince" but then admit that there is NO WAY the timeline COULD cover the prince UNLESS you chop it, slice it, dice it and toss it an undefined number of years in the future.
BTW - YOU ALSO claim that the CITY that is destroyed in Daniel 9 IS NOT the CITY that is BUILT in Daniel 9 --!!!
How wrong is that!!???
Your problems with this chapter appear to be myriad.
Lets SEE if that is true.You said the passage talks about one person (Messiah) and one group (people of the prince).
Well what do you know - JUST as I said the SUBJECTs in vs 26 are the MESSIAH and the PEOPLE of the prince -- the prince takes no action AT ALL in vs 26!!26 "Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined.
Amazing!
How obvious that the SINGLE person that DOES have focus in 26 is THE MESSIAH!
In Christ,
Bob