• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

A Calvinist Fails His Church Membership Interview

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A Calvinist, Mr. Dave Prepense, feels that he should join a church and after visiting many, many church websites over the years and after much research he settles on Grace Church. He likes the name and the fact that it is non-denominational. He has a meeting with the associate pastor, Pastor Taylor, for the purposes of an informal get together, a personal introduction, and preliminary membership interview.

After some pleasantries the discussion gets down to the subject at hand.

Pastor Taylor: “Tell me, Dave, are you a Christian?”

Dave: “Well, I exhibit the fruits of the spirit as described in Galatians. Since only believers can do that I consider myself a Christian. Nobody can really know they are of the Elect, though, until they pass, so it’s up to God to determine that.”

Pastor: “Can you point to a time in your life when you became a believer?”

Dave: “Do you mean like a specific date?”

Pastor: “A specific date would be great, but it could be a period of time, like sometime in July of 1996 or something like that.”

Dave: “Well, that depends on whose frame of reference you are relating it to. From God’s standpoint I’ve been a believer since before the foundation of the world, but from my standpoint I suppose it was 20 to 15 years ago. It was at this time that I discovered I was living out a lot of the fruits of the Spirit as mentioned in Galatians. I can’t nail down a specific year, though, as it was really sort of a slow realization that, hey, I could be part of the Elect.”

Pastor: “So, you can’t point to a specific incident or time when you repented and were converted because you believed in Jesus’ finished work on the cross?”

Dave: “As I said, I’ve been a believer from the time the earth was created. It says that in the Bible. At some point in my life, probably 20 years ago I was given a new heart, and with that the ability to believe, but really I can’t narrow it down to a specific year. Nobody can decide to become a Christian.”

Pastor: “Interesting. Previously you said you were a believer from before the foundation of the world and just now you said you were a believer from the time the earth was created. Which is it?”

Dave: “It depends on which translation is being used. I would put it at ‘before the foundation of the world’, as it says in the ESV. Pastor, when did you become a believer? Can you point to a specific time?”

Pastor: “Yes, I can. So, Dave, do people become Christians, or are they always Christians and they realize it at some point in their life?”

Dave: “Again, that depends on whose point of view you take. I believe that people are elected to salvation and this happens before the foundation of the world so, yes, for elected people, believing in Christ is inevitable, just a matter of time.”

Pastor: “So the thousands at Pentecost that Peter implored to ‘repent and be baptized that your sins may be blotted out’, or when Peter says, ‘repent and be converted’, or when the Bible says, ‘God commands all men everywhere to repent’, it really means that you should discover you are one of the Elect and start acting like it?”

Dave: “Well, I wouldn’t put it like that, but I suppose that’s a crude approximation.”

Pastor: “Dave, have you been baptized?”

Dave: “I don’t think the question should be whether or not I’ve been baptized, I think the question should be do you require baptism for membership in your church?”

[to be continued…]
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
So....I take it this is not a real person, just your idea of how a "calvinist" would answer the questions based on your view of Calvinism.

Instead of this, why don't you ask the people who hold to the doctrines of grace the same questions?
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So....I take it this is not a real person, just your idea of how a "calvinist" would answer the questions based on your view of Calvinism.

Instead of this, why don't you ask the people who hold to the doctrines of grace the same questions?
It's a satire. "Dave" is a composite of many responses from Calvinists I've read on BB over the years.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
Here you go, I'll take a shot.

Pastor Taylor, "Tell me Dave, are you a Christian?"

Dave,"Yes I am, by the grace of God"

Pastor, "Can you point to a time in your life when you became a believer?"

Dave, "Yes I can. I can also point to a time of repentence and faith toward my Lord Jesus, who he is and His work on the cross. However, I don't believe Holy Spirit necessarily works the same way with every person. I can think of a pastor in England, Dr. Martyn Lloyd Jones, who gave great evidence of conversion including passionate love for God and man, as well as a life devoted to the proclamation of the gospel. In his biography, Dr. Jones cannot point to a specific date of conversion. I don't believe that disqualifies his profession of faith. I do not suppose I have the spiritual insight to declare him unsaved because his experience was not the same as mine. Do you, pastor, have the spiritual insight to declare someone "saved or unsaved"?

Pastor, "So Dave, do people become Christians, or are they they already saved from the foundation of the world and just realize it at some point in their lives?"

Dave, "There is a dycotomy involved. Scripture tells us we chosen from the foundation of the world, that we are His sheep and He calls us by name...and also tells us we respond to the gospel with repentance and faith: both of which are necessary to appropriate the position of salvation before God.

Additionally, scripture does not say you cannot be really saved if you can't give a specific date and time when it happened."

I guess that's a start. I'm happy to answer questions as best I can.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"...necessary to appropriate the position of salvation"...

Never heard that one before. Thanks for the contribution.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
"Dave" is a lie and a liar. The entire narrative is filled with idiotic nonsense of what "calvinists believe."
Nobody can really know they are of the Elect, though, until they pass,
Lie #1.
Rom 8:16 The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God; 17 and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ;

1 John 5:13 These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life, and that you may continue to believe in the name of the Son of God.

From God’s standpoint I’ve been a believer since before the foundation of the world,
Lie #2. Nobody has believed from before the foundation of the world. They did not even exist until they were born and did not believe until they heard the Gospel preached.

I’ve been a believer from the time the earth was created.
Lie #2 restated. Same answer

It says that in the Bible.
Lie #3. No, it doesn't.

Instead of this, why don't you ask the people who hold to the doctrines of grace the same questions?
Because he would get the truth. And he can't stand the truth any more than he can stand Particular Redemption. It just chaps his hide that he can not take credit, in whole or in part, for his salvation, because it is all of the Lord.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"Dave" is a lie and a liar. The entire narrative is filled with idiotic nonsense of what "calvinists believe."
Lie #1.
Rom 8:16 The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God; 17 and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ;

"We can't know if we are elect until we die" was an answer my former Calvinist pastor gave in a Q&A session that was a part of his interview process. And yes, he is a well known person in Calvinistic circles. So, it's not a lie.

Lie #2. Nobody has believed from before the foundation of the world. They did not even exist until they were born and did not believe until they heard the Gospel preached.

Someone has stated this in BB just within the past month or so.

Lie #2 restated. Same answer

Same answer back at you.

Lie #3. No, it doesn't.

Calvinists have said this is in the Bible. I'm not saying it is, I'm saying they affirm it.

]Because he would get the truth. And he can't stand the truth any more than he can stand Particular Redemption. It just chaps his hide that he can not take credit, in whole or in part, for his salvation, because it is all of the Lord.

Yeah, Lie #1 on your part. I do not want to take credit, nor do I take credit for my salvation. Salvation is all of God.

Even the cable companies have fallen prey to Calvinism

Call on the name of the Lord is necessary
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The posting is fake. He knows it is fake. It outlines Hyper-calvinism, not calvinism.
I honestly get confused as to what is and is not "high" Calvinism. As a side question, When and why did "High Calvinism" become "Hyper Calvinism"?
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
"...necessary to appropriate the position of salvation"...

Never heard that one before. Thanks for the contribution.
You're welcome. I understand from scripture the necessity of the gospel, repentance and faith. I also see, clearly imho, the fact that God must intervene in a person's life, through Holy Spirit, before we will respond to the gospel with repentance and faith.

I have heard people argue that the "elect" are saved, whether they have faith or not. That is not biblical, and falls into the category of hyper-calvinists.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
I honestly get confused as to what is and is not "high" Calvinism. As a side question, When and why did "High Calvinism" become "Hyper Calvinism"?
What is commonly (but wrongly) called "Calvinism" can be divided into several categories.

1. Hyper-Calvinism believes God is the author of sin and man has no responsibility before God. The Gospel should only be preached to the elect. Anti-missionary. Belief in the five points is a prerequisite for true salvation. Supralapsarian.

2. Ultra High Calvinism believes that the elect are in some sense eternally justified. They deny the common call of the Gospel, Common Grace, and God having any love for the non-elect.

3. High Calvinism believes that God in no sense desires to save the reprobate, Most deny the legitimate Gospel offer. Supralapsarian

4. Calvinism believes that God does, in some sense, desire to save the reprobate, Infralapsarian. Accepts, in some form, Common Grace.

5. Low Calvinism believes that Christ died for all in a legal sense, so one can speak of Christ dying for the non-elect. That God has two distinct wills. Affirms the legitimate Gospel offer and Common Grace.

Quoted from Rev Jonathan James Goundry.

I would, for the most part, be a 4, but also accept that Christ died for all, but not necessarily in a legal sense. More likely in a practical sense so He can bless the lost with Common Grace of the former and latter rains, etc.
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
What is commonly (but wrongly) called "Calvinism" can be divided into several categories.

1. Hyper-Calvinism believes God is the author of sin and man has no responsibility before God. The Gospel should only be preached to the elect. Anti-missionary. Belief in the five points is a prerequisite for true salvation. Supralapsarian.

2. Ultra High Calvinism believes that the elect are in some sense eternally justified. They deny the common call of the Gospel, Common Grace, and God having any love for the non-elect.

3. High Calvinism believes that God in no sense desires to save the reprobate, Most deny the legitimate Gospel offer. Supralapsarian

4. Calvinism believes that God does, in some sense, desire to save the reprobate, Infralapsarian. Accepts, in some form, Common Grace.

5. Low Calvinism believes that Christ died for all in a legal sense, so one can speak of Christ dying for the non-elect. That God has two distinct wills. Affirms the legitimate Gospel offer and Common Grace.

Quoted from Rev Jonathan James Goundry.

I would, for the most part, be a 4, but also accept that Christ died for all, but not necessarily in a legal sense. More likely in a practical sense so He can bless the lost with Common Grace of the former and latter rains, etc.
Thanks, that is helpful
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What is commonly (but wrongly) called "Calvinism" can be divided into several categories.

1. Hyper-Calvinism believes God is the author of sin and man has no responsibility before God. The Gospel should only be preached to the elect. Anti-missionary. Belief in the five points is a prerequisite for true salvation. Supralapsarian.

2. Ultra High Calvinism believes that the elect are in some sense eternally justified. They deny the common call of the Gospel, Common Grace, and God having any love for the non-elect.

3. High Calvinism believes that God in no sense desires to save the reprobate, Most deny the legitimate Gospel offer. Supralapsarian

4. Calvinism believes that God does, in some sense, desire to save the reprobate, Infralapsarian. Accepts, in some form, Common Grace.

5. Low Calvinism believes that Christ died for all in a legal sense, so one can speak of Christ dying for the non-elect. That God has two distinct wills. Affirms the legitimate Gospel offer and Common Grace.

Quoted from Rev Jonathan James Goundry.

I would, for the most part, be a 4, but also accept that Christ died for all, but not necessarily in a legal sense. More likely in a practical sense so He can bless the lost with Common Grace of the former and latter rains, etc.
Thanks. Explains a lot.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What is commonly (but wrongly) called "Calvinism" can be divided into several categories.

By your own definition each of these various stances are categories of Calvinism, therefore they fall under the umbrella of Calvinism. Ergo, a person who says they were saved before the foundation of the Earth is a Calvinist. A person that says they can't know if they are truly Elect until they die is a Calvinist. A person that says they believe they are Elect because they exhibit the fruits of the Spirit is a Calvinist. They may be a Particular Type of Calvinist, but they are Calvinists.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
According to the chart presented by TC I would be a combo of numbers 2 and 3.There are parts of both that would have to be defined by TC however. For instance: common grace and the free offer.

I don't hold to Eternal Justification as John Gill and John Brine did. But even Charles Spurgeon, while disagreeing with it in large measure expressed commonality with it in some respects.
 
Top