Where is the line drawn in inciting violence?
What words are permissible and what are not?
At "pigs in a blanket fry 'em like bacon"?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Where is the line drawn in inciting violence?
What words are permissible and what are not?
Where is the line drawn in inciting violence?
What words are permissible and what are not?
NOT PERMISSIBLE!
""What do we want? Dead cops! When do what them? Now!"
Katie Pavlich - FLASHBACK: Al Sharpton's Marchers in New York City Chant "What Do We Want? Dead Cops!"
HankD
What inflammatory language is acceptable for a politician to use. Is Trump exempt?
I'm trying to remember...was it his inflammatory language that cost him the election? Or was it is denigration of women? Ohh, I know, it was his lying.
Hank, I have no idea what you are trying to say.
So, we cannot yell, fire, in a crowed theater. That is pretty well established.
What inflammatory language is acceptable for a politician to use. Is Trump exempt?
2016 saw jump in ambush attacks on police, including 5 killed in Dallas | Crime | Dallas NewsAmbush-style attacks of police officers rose dramatically in 2016.
Nationwide, 21 law enforcement officers were killed in such attacks, including the five officers fatally shot July 7 in downtown Dallas. It was the highest number of ambush deaths in more than 20 years, according to a preliminary report by the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund.
OK, what is this evidence?
OK since you asked :
The entire DNC has blood on their hands.
Not only do the aggressively support the murder of babies in the womb they officially support the murder of police officers because they support the BLM who chanted :
"What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? NOW!" This was on July 10, 2016.
The year 2016 saw deadly police ambushes rise dramatically in response to the BLM chant for "dead cops".
2016 saw jump in ambush attacks on police, including 5 killed in Dallas | Crime | Dallas News
The DNC supports BLM
DNC passes resolution supporting Black Lives Matter
Therefore EVERY DNC POLITICIAN shares in the guilt of the blood of these victims.
The DNC officially supports abortion (baby murder).
They demand the blood of babies through the phony mantra "It's my Body", when in reality it is God's.
They agree with the BLM requesting the blood of police officers.
The DNC is OFFICIALLY the party of murder and violence.
This why I left the Democratic Party.
Donald Trump did NOT yell "FIRE", he requested some people to be removed from a meeting.
This is far different than demanding the murder of babies and agreeing with the BLM for police officers to be murdered.
HankD
Deflection!!Sorry Hank. You went off topic again.
Another deflection!The GOP has lots of blood on its hands also. After all they may be pro-birth, but they are not pro-life and they are against the average person having a good life. They are fine with no health insurance, no medical help, no help of any kind for those in need. Don't be too smug.
You don't really expect an answer, do you?
Deflection!!
Another deflection!
Stop being such a progressive liberal CTB!
AOBTW I am neither (R) or (D).
HankD
They why do you continually support GOP positions?
Because it irritates the BB progressives so much!They why do you continually support GOP positions?
...only because the republican's didn't have the backbone to stand up and against OberryOHe was approved by a Republican controlled congress.
I guess if you view if Trump had yelled "FIRE!" that would have been OK also.
Sorry Hank. You went off topic again.
The GOP has lots of blood on its hands also. After all they may be pro-birth, but they are not pro-life and they are against the average person having a good life. They are fine with no health insurance, no medical help, no help of any kind for those in need. Don't be too smug.
Sorry Hank. You went off topic again.
The GOP has lots of blood on its hands also. After all they may be pro-birth, but they are not pro-life and they are against the average person having a good life. They are fine with no health insurance, no medical help, no help of any kind for those in need. Don't be too smug.
Where does this idea that the government is responsible for providing health care insurance to the masses come from?
I can only imagine Crabtownboy some fifty years from now--"The GOP is fine with people going with no self-driving car, no phone implant, no clone subsidies, no help of any kind for those in need."
The Constitution when it says, "provide for the common good."
The Constitution when it says, "provide for the common good."
I know about the clause "provide for the common defense" and I know about the clause "promote the general welfare", but I've never heard of this one.