A Republican explains why the GOP hates Obama

[OldRegular]

His concern is only for the innocent unborn, none for the innocent born.

That is a low blow, the same barnyard crap I get from CTB!

 

[kyredneck]

...keep on voting for those neocons, the party of death, OR.

 

[Zaac]

That is a low blow, the same barnyard crap I get from CTB!

It's the truth though.

Shame the devil and tell the truth. Do you care that a billion Muslims are on the way to hell?

Would you share the Gospel with a Muslim?

 

[OldRegular]

Would you share the Gospel with a Muslim?

When you come back from a missionary trip to Iran or Saudi Arabia then I will answer your stupid question.

 

[Revmitchell]

It is not that the GOP hates OBama, its that Obama hates the GOP/ Now we know just who it is that refuses to compromise:

“Obama and Valerie Jarrett will go to any lengths to prevent Hillary from becoming president,” a source close to the White House told me. “They believe that Hillary, like her husband, is left of center, not a true-blue liberal.”
If she gets into the White House, they believe she will compromise with the Republicans in Congress and undo Obama’s legacy.

http://nypost.com/2015/03/14/obama-adviser-behind-leak-of-hillary-clintons-e-mail-scandal/

 

[Zaac]

When you come back from a missionary trip to Iran or Saudi Arabia then I will answer your stupid question.

Been there and done that. :smilewinkgrin: And Turkey and Iraq and Afghanistan and Egypt and Kuwait too. Will go back as soon as God allows. Still working on getting into Syria some day hopefully real soon.

So answer my stupid question.

Naturally, you'll come back and say you don't believe me or prove it because you've got to have an excuse.

 

[poncho]

His concern is only for the innocent unborn, none for the innocent born.

That would follow the neocon's belief that only Americans are "exceptional and indispensable" everyone else is un exceptional and therefore dispensable.

I believe you are right, OR may be anti abortion but he is by no means pro life.

I've concluded that you are simply too dense to ever grasp it.

It's so simple even a musical monkey can grasp it. I believe OR knows full well what a neocon is but he chooses to play ignorant to protect his fragile false paradigm and keep it from collapsing in on itself.

Admitting that he knows what a neocon is would take away his biggest excuse for serving them as "unquestioningly" as he does.

The neocons are nothing more than a paranoid warmongering death cult that thrive on instilling their own paranoia, fears and hatred in others in order to grab more money, more power and more control for themselves.

They are the worst kind of parasites in a world ruled by parasitical elites.

They offer nothing but lies, war and chaos. They make huge claims they cannot support with evidence then when questioned about the lack of evidence they go into rants condemning whoever is doing the questioning and predict horrible death and destruction to anyone who does not take their word on faith alone.

I cannot see how one can be a follower of Jesus and the neocons. Jesus is pro love, life and courage, the neocons are pro hatred, death and fear. One is light the other is darkness.

 

[kyredneck]

... OR may be anti abortion but he is not pro life....

Though I'm sure that's not true about him, it's the perception he's building of himself when he repeatedly relentlessly condemns the Dems as 'the party of death' concerning the killing of the innocent unborn while turning a blind eye to the death and destruction of innocent lives by the neocons, the OTHER 'party of death', whether it be directly or indirectly from their interventionist schemes .

It's so simple even a musical monkey can grasp it. I believe OR knows full well what a neocon is but he chooses to play ignorant to protect himself from the truth.

His far right prejudice is no different than the extreme bias of the far left.

The neocons are nothing more than a paranoid warmongering death cult that thrive on instilling their own paranoia, fears and hatred in others in order to grab more money, more power and more control for themselves.

They are the worst kind of parasites in a world ruled by parasitical elites.

Now you're sounding like OR.

 

[poncho]

Though I'm sure that's not true about him, it's the perception he's building of himself when he repeatedly relentlessly condemns the Dems as 'the party of death' concerning the killing of the innocent unborn while turning a blind eye to the death and destruction of innocent lives by the neocons, the OTHER 'party of death', whether it be directly or indirectly from their interventionist schemes .



His far right prejudice is no different than the extreme bias of the far left.



Now you're sounding like OR.

With one major difference, I understand that both the democratic and republican parties have been infected by these parasites. The only "vaccine" against them and their lies is the truth. We can no longer afford to think in terms of "left vs right" if we're going to save our republic and preserve our freedoms.

It's no longer a matter of "left vs right" it's a matter of right vs wrong.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

And the world's leading Neo-Con is a democrat.

 

[kyredneck]

That may be so but I question if he ever intended to conform to their schemes.

 

[poncho]

That may be so but I question if he ever intended to conform to their schemes.

Probably not but the neocon's lies are so grand, their predictions so dire I can see where it would be easy to fall prey to them, once maybe even twice. But we've seen these neocons recycle the same old lies and scare tactics over and over in order to do the "regime change boogey" in several nations now.

How many times does one need to be fooled by the same old lies before one wakes up?

There comes a time to call a lie a lie even if it is wrapped neatly in the flag. Being patriotic is one thing but being blindly so is quite another.

 

[OldRegular]

Been there and done that. :smilewinkgrin: And Turkey and Iraq and Afghanistan and Egypt and Kuwait too. Will go back as soon as God allows. Still working on getting into Syria some day hopefully real soon.

You finally got one thing correct, prove it!

 

[poncho]

You finally got one thing correct, prove it!

Strange demand coming from you. I've asked you to prove your claims several times now but so far you've chosen to employ other methods instead.

I guess there's two sets of rules in play here eh? One for you and one for everyone else.

 

[kyredneck]

...I guess there's two sets of rules in play here eh? One for you and one for everyone else.

Yea, that's probably another perception of OR that's gaining traction here. He will 'dish it out but he can't take it'.

 

[OldRegular]

Strange demand coming from you. I've asked you to prove your claims several times now but so far you've chosen to employ other methods instead.

I guess there's two sets of rules in play here eh? One for you and one for everyone else.

This was my challenge to Zaac:

When you come back from a missionary trip to Iran or Saudi Arabia then I will answer your stupid question.

 

[OldRegular]

Yea, that's probably another perception of OR that's gaining traction here. He will 'dish it out but he can't take it'.

I simply ignore all the trash talk from poncho, the leading conspiracy theorist on this BB.

You and I have bantered back and forth for many years and I have enjoyed it. However when you parrot the response of CTB and Zaac regarding my views on the slaughter of the unborn child that is a low blow, I think beneath you!

His concern is only for the innocent unborn, none for the innocent born.

 

[poncho]

This was my challenge to Zaac:

I know, I recognized this "challenge" of your's right off. You've used it before to avoid answering questions.

It goes like this . . .

In order to avoid answering a question or having to provide evidence you'll throw out an impossible demand upon your opponent and then make a promise that on completion of said impossible demand you'll answer the question or provide the evidence. All the while knowing your opponent cannot complete the task thus you'll never have to answer the question or provide evidence.

It's just another under handed trick to avoid answering a question or providing evidence. I've learned your favorite "magic" tricks in our discussions. I am wondering how you could get by so long with so few of these tricks up your sleeve though. :smilewinkgrin:

One of these tricks I've noticed you use quite frequently is when confronted with evidence you cannot debunk with logic and documentation you instead resort to the old stand by "magical " incantation of chanting the words "conspiracy theory" as if you are channeling the spirit of a leading MSM talking head (or G.W. Bush himself) to make a mountain of evidence that runs contrary to your beloved corporate narratives disappear without a trace.

It's so cliche and over used now I'm surprised it's still in use. But then I guess when a corporate media lie needs to be defended it's a handy incantation to pull out and dust off.

 

[OldRegular]

I know, I recognized this "challenge" of your's right off. You've used it before to avoid answering questions.

It goes like this . . .

In order to avoid answering a question or having to provide evidence you'll throw out an impossible demand upon your opponent and then make a promise that on completion of said impossible demand you'll answer the question or provide the evidence. All the while knowing your opponent cannot complete the task thus you'll never have to answer the question or provide evidence.

It's just another under handed trick to avoid answering a question or providing evidence. I've learned your favorite "magic" tricks in our discussions. I am wondering how you could get by so long with so few of these tricks up your sleeve though. :smilewinkgrin:

One of these tricks I've noticed you use quite frequently is when confronted with evidence you cannot debunk with logic and documentation you instead resort to the old stand by "magical " incantation of chanting the words "conspiracy theory" as if you are channeling the spirit of a leading MSM talking head (or G.W. Bush himself) to make a mountain of evidence that runs contrary to your beloved corporate narratives disappear without a trace.

It's so cliche and over used now I'm surprised it's still in use. But then I guess when a corporate media lie needs to be defended it's a handy incantation to pull out and dust off.

After all that barnyard crap i better get out my lil monkey again!



No! this suits you better ponch!

 

[poncho]

After all that barnyard crap i better get out my lil monkey again!

No! this suits you better ponch!

Ran out of argument already eh? That didn't take long.

You are undoubtedly the oldest juvenile I have ever met OR. :laugh: