Lacy wrote:
BTW Where did you go? I answered.
Sorry, Lacy, but I can't live online. I have to work, sleep, attend church, eat...
Hmmm. Posting a link is answering? But I did check it out. Just don't really see the relevance of it. I had no doubt that there have been people who total believed that their Bible was 100% accurate and inspired. And of course it was the KJV back then, since there wasn't much to choose from.
Rat poison? Hey, that cake was for my mother-in-law...oh, uh, oops.
As for fruit, I agree that the KJV has borne a lot of it. After all, with a four hundred year headstart, it had better have had some kind of a crop, even if some of it is nuts

.
Now, if you were to compare the fruit of the KJV against the fruit of, say, the NIV on a year by year basis, starting from the date of publication, you would be surprised. The KJV came forth slowly, as they were printed, and as all other translations were confiscated. The NIV burst forth with media coverage and mass publication. So, how much fruit did the KJV produce it's first thirty years, as compared to the NIV's first thiry?
But, that doesn't really matter. What matters is that the fruit is souls that are saved from hell. Now if we could just get all these KJVOlators to quit strapping all these requirements on along with the free gift ("Thou shalt readeth no other version other than the holy KJV", "Thou shalt learn to read Olde English, and teacheth the fruit of thy loins the same", yada, yada, yada).
In Christ,
Trotter