Benjamin, your original part of the post stated, "Yet, some attempt to preach the Gospel message, the Word, the Light that God put into the world is full of darkness and despair for those poor non-preselected creatures who must remain ignorant and not have the real ability to know the truth of God’s love and are without hope to ever receive the promise."
You said, "This is the message of the Gospel we are to preach:
(1Jn 1:5) This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all."
To which I replied, "And this is true from the foundations of the world through the ages and on through eternity - for even in eternity there is no sun or moon, but Christ that gives all light."
Then you said, "Here is context for you: (Joh 1:9) That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
You’ve shown nothing out of context here."
Of course I didn't take anything out of context, but you did.
You determine that the world has the understanding and the ability to comprehend and receive the light. That the world does not dwell in darkness. The context of the post of John that you stated does not support such conclusions. In fact John states the exact opposite.
John's whole paragraph states:
"5 And the light shines in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light .
9 That was the true Light, which lights every man that comes into the world.
10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Please note the underlined parts that show that light was not only not comprehended but rejected.
Those who were saved (did receive the light) were born of God.
There was NOTHING other than the direct purposed work of God that made the difference.
Because of that purposed work of God to those that would comprehend and would receive the light, they, because of the work of God, did comprehend and did receive.
Without the direct and purposed intervention as John clearly indicates there is neither the ability to receive nor the comprehension to perceive the light.
Therefore, your statement, quoted at the beginning of this post, stands in error.
If you disagree, then show by Scriptures where I have underlined incorrectly, or John misspoke.
