Is that a yes or a no?And what name would you call the boy or man?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Is that a yes or a no?And what name would you call the boy or man?
Wouldn't God call that whoredom?
So as long as you defend Akin it is just as logical to say your are supporting rape.
There is no inquisition. He did this to himself. You are defending him and, by the logic you use to accuse me of being pro-abortion, you are pro rape.
Crabtownboy you are lying again. When have I ever supported cutting meals on wheels? Incidentally if you know someone who is hungry it is your Christian duty to feed them.And as long as you support cutting funds to social program, like meals on wheels, again by your logic, you are supporting the starvation of our sick and elderly.
Now either start being honest or I will continue to use your illogical logic.
It is lying to say Akin supported rape!
That is what the Spanish Inquisitors always say!
Crabtownboy you are lying again. When have I ever supported cutting meals on wheels? Incidentally if you know someone who is hungry it is your Christian duty to feed them.
I am not defending Akin and I will not vote for him as you do abortionists. I am simply saying the over reaction by some is comparable to the Inquisition!
I am only using your illogical logic.
I am only using your illogical logic.
I am only using your illogical logic.
I am only using your illogical logic.
Will you continue your illogical logic? As long as you do so I will do so.
Defending Akin is defending rape ... again just using your illogical logic.
Politicians survive by pandering. Sometimes in the midst of that pandering they trip over their tongues.
I reckon that's what happened here. Imho of course.
Got a question for ya Crabby how is that liberals seem to feel justified in accusing conservatives of not caring enough for the poor? When was the last time a liberal helped the poor without first confiscating the money of a conservative by government force to do it?
Conservatives give from the heart, liberals give what they force from other's pockets.
Who cares for the poor more?
Poncho! Poncho! Poncho!
It is called the Robin Hood Syndrome! All liberals are afflicted with it. This problem was first noticed; well to tell the truth I don't know. But its has been around since the first liberal was conceived; therefore, it must be genetic.
Now how does this sickness manifest itself. I suspect as toddlers they are always whining Mine, Mine, Mine! It gets worse with maturity; sorry shouldn't use that word, they don't mature. It gets worse with age. Mine! becomes "what is Mine is Mine" and "part of what is yours belongs to the poor folks", and they will use the boss man [That is pore folk talk for the govment!] just in case!
Now Poncho they can't help it. I told you this "sickness' was genetic, caused by one of them mutations I think. Except this time it backfired and we got "Robin Hood Syndrome"!
Is that a yes or a no?And your point would be..............??????
Make your point or be quiet, I have no time for stupidityIs that a yes or a no?
The Robin Hood Syndrome? That kinda puts ole Robin in a a bad light don't ya think? Robin was a champion of individual rights. Liberals would gladly use government force to sacrifice Robin today for the good of the many.
The sickness that liberals today suffer with is called collectivism. I doubt Robin would have any part of that. He only stole from the rich to give back what the rich had been stealing from the poor.
I do see your point though. Liberals would love to be considered the new Robin Hoods.
Your refusal to answer a simple question has made the point for me.Make your point or be quiet, I have no time for stupidity
Crabtownboy you vote for abortionists and have defended that vote on this Forum saying there are bigger issues like welfare, taxing the rich, etc.
Your childish mantra above is an admission that you have done so and will continue to do so!
Your refusal to answer a simple question has made the point for me.
You are going to vote for a person who wants to cut social programs for the sick and elderly. Thus according to your illogical logic you support letting the sick die and the elderly starve. I am only using your illogical logic here.
You have defended Akin saying he should not be attacked. Thus, using your logic, you are defending rape.
If he is engaging in whoredom, then adulterer, fornicator, whoremonger—take your pick. But is rapist an accurate term?Aaron -- yes, God would call it whoredom. What do we call what the 45-year old man did?
You are going to vote for a person who wants to cut social programs for the sick and elderly. Thus according to your illogical logic you support letting the sick die and the elderly starve. I am only using your illogical logic here.
You seem unable to see that a person can support one candidate over another without embracing all of what that person supports. This means you, as I have said, support rape, starvation of the elderly, no help for the uninsured sick, and no help for children of very poor people and single mothers.
Old, I am only using your logic. You do not seem to like it when your logic is turned and used on you.
You have defended Akin saying he should not be attacked. Thus, using your logic, you are defending rape. When you stop you illogical logic to attack me I will stop using your illogical logic to show how poor your logic is.
You are the one who started and continues to use such illogical logic. Stop using it and we can have a rational discussion.
:wavey::thumbs::laugh::BangHead: Whoa, whoa, whoa....back up the truck Chuck (forgive me for derailing this thread for one itty bitty moment all)
Republicans do NOT want to cut Medicare and Social Security. OBAMA, on the other hand, wants to euthenize sick and elderly through his Obamacare....that seems FAR worse to me. (BTW, what did retired folks do before FDR???)
I now return you to your regularly scheduled debate.