• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Adam soul?

loDebar

Well-Known Member
But we can and do separate some things , as an egg. shell yoke white. We eat eggs but do not include shell. We buy eggs but do include shell.. This post says Adam became a living soul but Gen 2 7 does not call him a soul but a living being. He was already a "spiritual being" a soul. God created him. But we do not have a verse that says God makes souls at conception or anytime except God created all things . In other posts, Adam had or was a soul when he got here ,
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Well we are born of the Spirit not the soul.
Galatians 4:29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
I will admit that I have rejoiced in both soul and spirit simultaneously - some times when I hear old classic hymns e.g. Living For Jesus. a Life That Is True
About 50 years ago at a "Revival" this song was sung at the invitation of believer sanctification, I responded positively.
My life was definitely changed and my wife and I went off to bible college.
Even today this song brings forth a medley of emotion. Some sorrow of soul because I have failed Him (sometimes miserably) so often.
Some rejoicing in my spirit because as He promised "I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee".

I take it this was meant to indicate our soul or core attributes is part of our human spirit. I so I agree.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But we can and do separate some things , as an egg. shell yoke white. We eat eggs but do not include shell. We buy eggs but do include shell.. This post says Adam became a living soul but Gen 2 7 does not call him a soul but a living being. He was already a "spiritual being" a soul. God created him. But we do not have a verse that says God makes souls at conception or anytime except God created all things . In other posts, Adam had or was a soul when he got here ,
There is no Scripture that supports your claim Adam was already a living being prior to creation or became possessed by some soul following creation.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I take it this was meant to indicate our soul or core attributes is part of our human spirit. I so I agree.
Yes there is a "mingling" of the two but I believe they are two distinct (but not separate) entities.
 

loDebar

Well-Known Member
There is no Scripture that supports your claim Adam was already a living being prior to creation or became possessed by some soul following creation.

Right, we have to put it together logically. Gen 2" 7 does not say he became a living soul as we had been told. So where the body and soul together, We know a soul was created, as all things, but his body was formed not created. Where is my soul before birth if I am condemned already?
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes there is a "mingling" of the two but I believe they are two distinct (but not separate) entities.
Yes I know that is you view, but can you point to anything that the soul or spirit does that the other does not also do. In other words, if there is no distinction why not conclude the two words express the same thing, our spiritual being. with the soul being the core attributes of our human spirit.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes I know that is you view, but can you point to anything that the soul or spirit does that the other does not also do. In other words, if there is no distinction why not conclude the two words express the same thing, our spiritual being. with the soul being the core attributes of our human spirit.
An animal that can “Live forever” | SiOWfa15: Science in Our World: Certainty and Controversy I can and do conclude that both soul and spirit are the immaterial parts of man but they are not one and the same because scripture itself makes a distinction:

Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
 

loDebar

Well-Known Member
An animal that can “Live forever” | SiOWfa15: Science in Our World: Certainty and Controversy I can and do conclude that both soul and spirit are immaterial but they are not one in the same because scripture it\self makes a distinction:

Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.


They are not the same because they react to different stimuli , a picture of a loved one or perhaps a sunset stimulates the soul.
A pun or puzzle stimulates or determining directions stimulates the spirit or mind
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
An animal that can “Live forever” | SiOWfa15: Science in Our World: Certainty and Controversy I can and do conclude that both soul and spirit are the immaterial parts of man but they are not one and the same because scripture itself makes a distinction:

Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

The fact that the word of God can penetrate and alter the very core of our spiritual being does not indicate two entities. If a sword penetrated our body, dividing asunder flesh and blood, would that indicate we are two entities, flesh and blood? Of course not.

And since you did not indicate anything distinctive of the soul or spirit that is not also part of the other, perhaps the two part position has more merit than the three part view.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The fact that the word of God can penetrate and alter the very core of our spiritual being does not indicate two entities. If a sword penetrated our body, dividing asunder flesh and blood, would that indicate we are two entities, flesh and blood? Of course not.
Nonetheless a distinction is made between soul and spirit also in:

1 Thessalonians 5:23 And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes but the distinction does not say the spirit and soul are two different entities, only that they are parts of the whole. Our soul ((core attributes) is part of us and part of our human spirit. There is absolutely no support for the three entity view, just mistaken interpretation. Soul and spirit are used interchangeably in scripture, with no distinctive attributes. Imagine a human spirit without core attributes. Or a spiritless soul. You can't do it.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes but the distinction does not say the spirit and soul are two different entities, only that they are parts of the whole. Our soul ((core attributes) is part of us and part of our human spirit. There is absolutely no support for the three entity view, just mistaken interpretation. Soul and spirit are used interchangeably in scripture, with no distinctive attributes. Imagine a human spirit without core attributes. Or a spiritless soul. You can't do it.
As I said before they are mingled or more perhaps as tea and sugar distinct entities commingled. I am not convinced by your rebuttal.

They appear to be used interchangeably because they often function together to the same end.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Let me make a slight, ever so slight alteration, they appear to be used interchangeably because they always function together to the same end. :) There are no examples where our human spirit functions without its soul or core attributes. None, zip nada.
 

loDebar

Well-Known Member
There is no Scripture that supports your claim Adam was already a living being prior to creation or became possessed by some soul following creation.

Yet no scripture He had a soul suggests WE decided it logically . He sinned therefore he had a soul. (Bodies do not sin.)

As all people are condemned already (John 3:18) and since sin is not inherited nor Adam had an earthly father where did he get the "sin nature". ?

Did God create us, put us here, knowing we would sin, just to saved some of us and send others to eternal judgement? NO. an insult to God,
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yet no scripture He had a soul suggests WE decided it logically . He sinned therefore he had a soul. (Bodies do not sin.)

As all people are condemned already (John 3:18) and since sin is not inherited nor Adam had an earthly father where did he get the "sin nature". ?

Did God create us, put us here, knowing we would sin, just to saved some of us and send others to eternal judgement? NO. an insult to God,
Even if you back our sin up into heaven as pre-existant spirits you still have to ask the question where did we/he get the "sin nature"?

You haven't answered that question and you can't.

Advise FWIW stop questioning God. Romans 5:12 is the answer Adam brought sin and death into the world of humanity.
We were in effect all there when Adam sinned. We sin. Live with the fact.

Better yet, live with the central concept of Christianity
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
 

loDebar

Well-Known Member
The willingness to disobey God is our free will created in us. When was the spiritual part created? The sin itself happened after we were created as spiritual beings but before physical creation .
In Adams's case not when he became "living soul" .This is verified in 1 Cor 15:45, Romans 5 is showing as all men can be saved by the actions of one just as sin "entered" the physical world to the detriment of all.
The Corinthians verse shows it was not spiritual for Adam but the physical or attitude to sin. He sinned because he was a sinner.

We did decided it ignorantly based upon the combined usage on the word soul in Hebrew Gen 2:7 and ignoring the meaning of the words soul and spirit in 1 Cor 15:45
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I’m really rather unimpressed with this thread.

The thread isn't for the purpose of impressing people, it is for the purpose of looking at an issue in a little more depth than people usually do.


Not certain the topic is even necessary considering where it has seemed to wander

There have been a number of posts that go into detail in regards to the subject. Perhaps if you paid a little more attention it might become of interest to you.


From the posts on this thread it seems some determination on thinking of categorizing and separating even in areas that are not necessary.

On the contrary, my position asserts that the modern, pulpit bred mythology of a tri-part being not only imposes a concept not found in Scripture (yet embraced by many, who also don't look at issues in detail), it wreaks havoc on proper interpretation.

As I have said, this concept is the very reason why we have cults who teach Annihilation and Soul Sleep, and in general have a natural understanding of Scripture.


Water is wet, wet has no elements such as water, yet the two are inseparable except by the authority of the creator.

Yet if we go into the elements of water...we see a much broader discussion which extends to Ice and steam.

;)

And you are invited to look at the elements, rather than look at one form of a substance.


We may acknowledge, we may inspect, and we might even speculate. We have no power or authority to separate.

I agree, so why do people separate the soul from the person? You preach against the opposing positions error, lol.


God bless.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes its totally amazing,our dogs are ALWAYS happy to see and greet us. Oh that we humans could learn that from them :Roflmao

Okay, Hank, it seems you are satisfied with claiming victory, and offering a condescending attitude in a topic you have not even begun to support from your perspective.

You do get extra credit for humor, though.

Let me know if you ever come to a dedicated position on this and are able to teach why it is Scriptural.


God bless.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Okay, Hank, it seems you are satisfied with claiming victory, and offering a condescending attitude in a topic you have not even begun to support from your perspective.

You do get extra credit for humor, though.

Let me know if you ever come to a dedicated position on this and are able to teach why it is Scriptural.


God bless.
As the old saying goes

Don't hold yur breath! :Rolleyes
 
Top