People generally speak well of him on several topics.
He did not have light on Roman's 8 or 9 however.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Adrian Rodgers
- Thread starter Salty
- Start date
- Status
He did not have light on Roman's 8 or 9 however.
Its sad really. People who probably in their entire life have not won the people to Christ that Adrian did on one of his worst Sundays call him a false teacher.
They need our prayers
He was classic arminian! But still used by the Lord as one to reach His own and train them up in the faith!
Not false teacher as in not saved, but he misunderstand sotierology, but still used by God to reach and train up His own!
The good news did not explain salvation to called to service.
The good news does not need slick talking around, but rather exegesis of the text.
People do not get deceived into the Kingdom.
Last edited by a moderator:
Particular
Well-Known Member
It is sad when you three ignore the gospel of Jesus and then twist it to be only something John Calvin imagined in his mind. Verse after verse, passage after passage speaks of God's glorious grace being given to whom God wills, yet you cannot accept it and instead think Calvin made it up, that it doesn't exist in God's word.
All three of you, man up and read your Bible. Tell us that Jesus did not say what he said and that his Apostles did not write what they wrote. So far, you cling to about 10 sentences to create your soteriological position and then you ignore the passages that prove your position inaccurate.
Will you do that? Will you stick with scripture? Doubtful. It's much more lazy to just say "Calvinism" and walk away thinking your comments are justified.
Be men. Do your due diligence in scouring God's word. It would do you well to read the whole of scripture and accept the blessed Sovereignty of God in all things, including your own salvation.
You are disappointing icon.
There are those who preach and te
God still uses non Calvinist to give forth the Gospel message, and to train up and mature the redeemed!
Yes, as the one who will be able to do that would be the One elected by God, so can be used well!
you disobey the scripture and probably grieve the Spirit of Gob by following Calvin OR THE TEACHING OF ANY MAN NOT INSPIRED OF THE HOLY SPIRIT.
1 Corinthians 1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
21 century revision
1 Corinthians 1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Calvin; and I of Arminius; and I of Billy Graham; and I of Christ.
13 Is Christ divided? was CALVIN crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of CALVIN?
We can trace the beginnings of particular Baptist theology right back into Gospel of John and Romans themselves!
Calvin and other reformers rediscovered that, but did not originate that theology!
As far as I'm concerned once you attach the NAME OF A MORTAL MAN (e.g. calvin) to salvation YOU HAVE CORRUPTED THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST.
Acts 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
If I were a charismatic I would shout HALLELUJAH, GLORY BE TO GOD! for that verse
BUT SINCE I'M A BAPTIST AN amen! will have to do
Acts 4:12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
If I were a charismatic I would shout HALLELUJAH, GLORY BE TO GOD! for that verse
BUT SINCE I'M A BAPTIST AN amen! will have to do
You would rather the ones they reached go to Hell.
Our history (Christian, not necessarily Calvinism) is replete with examples of God using faithful, spirit-filled men to reach multitudes for His Kingdom.
The list includes Calvinists like Whitfield (even though he advocated slavery), Wesley (even though he was not Baptist), D.L.Moody (even though he rejected Calvinism), Billy Graham (even though he focused on the gospel apart from denominational divides), Adrian Rodgers, ect.
I am tired of hearing the foolishness that boarders on proclaiming Calvinism as the way, truth, and life.
As Christians we need to realize that the “heroes of the faith”, men who have labored faithfully, men who were used greatly by God, are no less because they held understandings of Scripture differently.
Argue doctrine, but do not become an enemy of God by striving against God’s people and slandering other Christians.
The list includes Calvinists like Whitfield (even though he advocated slavery), Wesley (even though he was not Baptist), D.L.Moody (even though he rejected Calvinism), Billy Graham (even though he focused on the gospel apart from denominational divides), Adrian Rodgers, ect.
I am tired of hearing the foolishness that boarders on proclaiming Calvinism as the way, truth, and life.
As Christians we need to realize that the “heroes of the faith”, men who have labored faithfully, men who were used greatly by God, are no less because they held understandings of Scripture differently.
Argue doctrine, but do not become an enemy of God by striving against God’s people and slandering other Christians.
We all liked listening to Dr. Dobson on training children.
His theology surrounding the events of 9/11 was horrible.
Both can be true. Or you can make believe it is all good.
So you introduce the name of Calvin then criticize people for talking about him but you suggest Adrian Rogers is okay is that right?
#4.
- Status