Adult Stem Cells Provide Little To No Help

I not only believe in using these discarded stem cells, but the scientific community should grow stem cells specifically for the purpose of research.

 

So say this is allowed. Where does it stop? How far is too far?

 

Libs dont want to water board terrorists like Osama Bin Laden to gain information that will save thousands of lives but they want to destroy innocent human embryos. What kind of sick mind does it take to get your brain wrapped around that.

 

False premise!

First whether we have him or not is irrelevent to my point. But nice try on the redirection.

Second not gaining life saving info is the inhumane action.

Third valuable info has been obtianed my many different means.

Fourth a human being does not come out of your pathetic list.:BangHead:

 

Just because fertilized eggs are flushed out naturally, this does not give us the right to murder them un-naturally.

People die and are buried naturally, does this give me the right to kill people?

 

Why is it so important to add years on to our lives on this earth that we should murder human babies to do it?

 

Pure evil!

 

i have heard it bluntly stated in this city that children are nonessential if not a threat to society whatsoever, and that immortality is the key objective-not another generation to secluar people. At this point not only is the medical field under attack for 'not even wanting to heal people,' but us as well with the notion that Christians don't care about death! It's going to get where we'll all be considered insane and locked up or worse...

 

And yet none of the things you list is what makes us human. People who are on life support are human people with nerve damage who can not touch are human people who are missing hands and feet are human and even ugly babies without little cherubic faces are human.

Like I said before. Humans procreate. When two humans reproduce the ONLY product that they can make is human. We do not start life as one species and become another. If a 6 month old baby is human then baby who is not born yet is also human. There is only one reason to rename a very young human baby. That reason is to justify murdering it. I dont have any reason to rename a human baby just because of its youth. So you will have to get use to me calling them babies.

MP, I have a question for you. What makes us humans?

 

the only blame then is to God himself for not showing us that a soul is formed at the exact moment of fertilization. Is it really that hard to provide an inspiration for such a device to detect that? Then again, how harder would it be to advocate for laws on manipulating spirits?

 

When does a blastocyst become a fetus? Is there some stage between the two? Can you kill a blastocyst as it is becoming a fetus? Can you kill a fetus? When does a fetus become a baby? Is a fetus a human being? Is a blastocyst a human being?

I forgot embryos and zygotes, are they human beings? Can they be killed?

Where do you draw the line? (Scientifically or Scripturally)

 

You should hear Senator Boxers answer to that one.

 

I can only imagine. :tear:

 

The logical end of this utilitarian approach will be a population of human "predators" that consume/prey upon/destroy a population of human "prey" to further their own existence.

Once you make the step suggested above, there's no logical stop to "harvesting" unwanted kids to serve as biological used-parts stores.

I'm not suggesting that Terry is in favor of what I conclude will happen--but rather that there will be nothing to stop those without a moral compass from eventually doing so.

Right now, the operative question is, "Is it a child?" It's not that long of a moral decline before the operative question will be, "Is it a useful or well-functioning child?" From there, we quickly go to, "Is it a wanted child?" and finally, "Is there a market for this child?"

Let's stop the process before it reaches the point of no return, folks.

 

MP, I have a question for you. What makes us humans?

Everything you could name I can find a human being who is without. Except one thing that you hit on before.

If I am really hairy am I a chimpanze. If I am born with my feet fused into what looks like a fin am I a fish. If I am born with web toes am I a frog. No WHY?

Because my DNA says I am a human. Do your blytoplasts have the same DNA as us? or does it change when they are born? Basing if we are human based on looks is not accurate.

If a detective goes to a crime scene and finds a pool of blood but no body. How do they determin if the blood is from a human?

DNA

Dont they need to see the body to determin if it is human. Dont they need to check to see if it has arms and legs, lungs, smiles a cute face?