Agenda 21. Anybody know about this ?

Why don't we just talk about Agenda 21 and how it's being implemented instead of going off on tangents?

 

Whatever. :type:

Agenda 21 is a failure.

I just retired from the Federal Government after 34 years.
I made over 1Million$ while keeping my Country independent
of foriegn governments/powers.

Say, what were you doing back in 1976 when we figured
that by 1998 the world would belong to Saudi Arabia
due to the HIGH PRICE ($0.52 per gallon) of gasoline?

 

Okay so you shouldn't have any problem proving it then. Have at it brother Ed. We'll start a new thread if you need more space. :smilewinkgrin:

 

Sorry, the onus is on you. Be sure to use only conspiracy theory
sources that quote each other only :love2:

 

So I can't use Lou Dobbs and Jerome Corsi? Oh wait, they're libruls, (we can't use them either) even though Corsi writes regularly for a neocon mag and Dobbs has the documents and is all for securing the borders and American sovereignty. I do declare you coincidence theorists sure have to resort to alot of twisting and subterfuge these days to stay in your little comfort zone. :laugh: :thumbs:

It's begining to look like changing the subject and name calling is all you coincidence theorists got left to debate with. Have a good night Ed.

 

I suppose the sending of jobs off shore is an American voter plan?

 

They are trying to remove the dams on the Klamath river under the guise of restoring fisheries for the native american population (without regard for flood control.) I've seen references to Agenda 21 in discussions of the Klamath. Apparantly the implementation plan states "For indigenous peoples, dams are not environmentally sustainable nor socially acceptable". Since I'm part owner on a property on the Klamath River that could see very negative effects if the dams are removed, I'd say I could be affected. As an avid salmon fisherman, I also think that if the dams are removed, so much for controllable flows to ensure consistent salmon results.

 

And now this just came out: http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=12242

I don't think this is a conspiracy theory, I think this is wide out in the open. Using standards set by the World Health Organization, as opposed to the CDC or a similar organization.

 

at:
http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=12242

it says:

" ... which produces a compound known to cause
liver failure and promote tumor growth."

What is that compound? Is that compound water?

Such statements are misleading information typical
of Conspiracy Sites.

But, of course, if it were a terrrorist attack,
the USGovernment is behind it:sleep:

 

He who posts last posts best :laugh:

 

Agenda 21 is already being implemented in france and I'm scared. I was recently made to watch a documentary about it: http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1800177633/info

 

Does anybody here have any idea what is the meaning of
'[FONT=Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif]sustainable economic development'? Or easier still, you don't have
to know anything about 'economic' or 'development'.
Just what is 'sustainable'?
[/FONT]

 

This...

http://www.oceanlaw.net/texts/uncedrio.htm

points to this,

United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1972)


Held in Stockholm in 1972, the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment was the first global environmental conference and the precursor to the 1992 United Nations Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

The purpose of the conference was not to discuss scientific or technological approaches to environmental problems but to coordinate international policy. A 27-nation committee held four meetings in the two years preceding the conference, and in the months leading up to it they issued a report calling for "a major reorientation of man's values and redeployment of his energies and resources." In their preliminary report, the committee emphasized their political priorities: "The very nature of environmental problems—that is to say, their intricate interdependence—is such as to require political choices."

http://www.bookrags.com/sciences/biology/united-nations-conference-on-the-hu-enve-02.html

Sustainable development whatever it is so far reads like a humanist manifesto of the redistribution of wealth or in other words godless socialism on a global scale to me. Anybody here care to take a crack at decoding the "Rio Principles" and what they may mean to Christianity and our sovereingty as a nation in the United States? I know on the surface they all sound good warm and fuzzy, but what do they really mean?

 

quoted from a UN supporter:
//"The very nature of environmental problems—that is to say, their intricate interdependence—is such as to require political choices."//

Yes. The essence of WHO GETS WHAT STUFF is what politics is all
about.

Poncho: //Sustainable development whatever it is so far reads like
a humanist manifesto on the redistribution of wealth
or in other words godless socialism on a global scale to me.//

By the same token, I don't think the humanists should get all the stuff
and not leave some stuff for me and mine; I don't theink the godless socialists
should get all the stuff and not leave some stuff for me and mine.

That is what sustainable development is: continuing the amount of stuff
to share among all the people, including the people you don't like
(such as humanists and godless socialists).

 

Ed, just because I don't agree with someone doesn't mean I don't like them. You and I disagree on many things but I don't dislike you. Do you dislike everyone you disagree with?

Sustainable development is just what the UNers say it is..."a major reorientation of man's values and redeployment of his energies and resources." It all boils down to a small group of elite having control of everything.

 

Sounds like communism to me.