Aiding and abetting illegal immigration

[Wesley Briggman]

While I heartily approve of quoting scripture, these passages have nothing to do with the subject at hand. Moreover, they do not negate the teaching of Jesus in Matthew 25:31-46. You WILL be held accountable by Jesus. Do not reject His clear teaching.

These verses clearly show God places His responsibility with His sheep supplying them with spiritual food. He does not place His responsibility elsewhere.

I don't know where you get the idea that immigrants do not work. It's not true.

Report: More than half of immigrants on welfare
"Those numbers increase for households with children, with 76% of immigrant-led households receiving welfare, compared to 52% for the native-born."

I suspect that many of these households have workers within them getting paid in cash as part of the underground economy. More law-breaking.

Immigrants come to the United States to provide for themselves and their household. Again, I don't think you understand the situation at all.

See response above.

Enough already.

 

[777]

So now Jesus was an open borders nut? Anything for the votes.

I'm saying that killing a woman who has an abortion doesn't fit into my idea of pro-life. Isn't her life as valuable as the child's?

My neighbor's basset hound has fleas.

Again, why do you support and advocate for the party of infanticide and abortion on demand? How do you reconcile supporting that with the commandment "thou shall not murder", seeing that it's murder? Can you just answer the question?

 

[FollowTheWay]

So now Jesus was an open borders nut? Anything for the votes.



My neighbor's basset hound has fleas.

Again, why do you support and advocate for the party of infanticide and abortion on demand? How do you reconcile supporting that with the commandment "thou shall not murder", seeing that it's murder? Can you just answer the question?

You didn't answer the question I posed. How is killing the mother pro-life?

 

[Wingman68]

You didn't answer the question I posed. How is killing the mother pro-life?

Let me guess......you don’t agree with the death penalty as punishment for capital crimes.

 

[church mouse guy]

Wingman, you're right. He wants to control life and death by comparing apples and oranges in typical commie style.

 

[777]

You didn't answer the question I posed. How is killing the mother pro-life?

I asked you a question first:

Again, why do you support and advocate for the party of infanticide and abortion on demand? How do you reconcile supporting that with the commandment "thou shall not murder", seeing that it's murder?

Who is wanting to "kill the mother"? The mother of what, the dead baby? That's not in the GOP platform, pre-RvW had at worst criminal penalties. Neither is pro-life at all, but the party you support is for infanticide and abortion on demand. How can you support such a barbaric practice as a Christian?

 

[FollowTheWay]

Let me guess......you don’t agree with the death penalty as punishment for capital crimes.

Won't answer the question?

 

[FollowTheWay]

I asked you a question first:

Again, why do you support and advocate for the party of infanticide and abortion on demand? How do you reconcile supporting that with the commandment "thou shall not murder", seeing that it's murder?

Who is wanting to "kill the mother"? The mother of what, the dead baby? That's not in the GOP platform, pre-RvW had at worst criminal penalties. Neither is pro-life at all, but the party you support is for infanticide and abortion on demand. How can you support such a barbaric practice as a Christian?

This is a law being considered by the Texas state legislation, that women having abortions should be subject to the death penalty.

 

[Wingman68]

I

Won't answer the question?

I believe I did.

 

[church mouse guy]

As RCC Cardinal Sarah, the man who should have been Pope instead of the idiot Frances, said migration is the new globalist slavery.

 

[777]

This is a law being considered by the Texas state legislation, that women having abortions should be subject to the death penalty.

Yes? The same guy proposed the same bill two years ago, and both times it died in committee. A committee comprised mostly of Republicans. There's only two groups that are exempt from the death penalty in that state, abortionists and their clients.

So I can see where he's coming from with this "eye for an eye" mindset and also where the opponents are coming from - kind of stupid that some abortionist could be put to death for a chemical abortion in Texas, but across the border in New Mexico, he/she has free reign to perform a 39 week abortion, just as your party likes. So again, can you answer:

Why do you support and advocate for the party of infanticide and abortion on demand? How do you reconcile supporting that with the commandment "thou shall not murder", seeing that it's murder? You often moralize but how can you think you have any moral high ground when you support a practice this hideous?

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

You didn't answer the question I posed. How is killing the mother pro-life?

No doubt your concern is appreciated, but to argue that it is pro-life to protect murder and murderers is to abandon reason.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Yes? The same guy proposed the same bill two years ago, and both times it died in committee. A committee comprised mostly of Republicans. There's only two groups that are exempt from the death penalty in that state, abortionists and their clients.

So I can see where he's coming from with this "eye for an eye" mindset and also where the opponents are coming from - kind of stupid that some abortionist could be put to death for a chemical abortion in Texas, but across the border in New Mexico, he/she has free reign to perform a 39 week abortion, just as your party likes. So again, can you answer:

Why do you support and advocate for the party of infanticide and abortion on demand? How do you reconcile supporting that with the commandment "thou shall not murder", seeing that it's murder? You often moralize but how can you think you have any moral high ground when you support a practice this hideous?

Do you support needless, everlasting wars like the ones GW Bush started which kill hundreds of thousands of the born?

 

[just-want-peace]

Do you support needless, everlasting wars like the ones GW Bush started which kill hundreds of thousands of the born?

 

[just-want-peace]

Do you support needless, everlasting wars like the ones GW Bush started which kill hundreds of thousands of the born?

WHOA!!!!! Surprise, surprise, surprise. Won't/can't answer party support question, so start a "rabbit trail" that is alien to the subject at hand & see if able to DODGE the question!!??
Extremely typical of leftist talking tactics!

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

WHOA!!!!! Surprise, surprise, surprise. Won't/can't answer party support question, so start a "rabbit trail" that is alien to the subject at hand & see if able to DODGE the question!!??
Extremely typical of leftist talking tactics!

Here is another dodge that he is aware of... one that helped destroy New Jersey.... “It’s for the children!”

 

[FollowTheWay]

These verses clearly show God places His responsibility with His sheep supplying them with spiritual food. He does not place His responsibility elsewhere.



Report: More than half of immigrants on welfare
"Those numbers increase for households with children, with 76% of immigrant-led households receiving welfare, compared to 52% for the native-born."

I suspect that many of these households have workers within them getting paid in cash as part of the underground economy. More law-breaking.



See response above.

Enough already.

This same report said:

Camarota said one of the most shocking findings from the report was the high number of native-born Americans also on welfare. About 76% of immigrant households with children are on welfare, but so are 52% of native-born households with children.

"Most people have a sense that if you were to work for $10 an hour, 40 hours a week, you couldn't be receiving welfare, could you? You couldn't be living in public housing, could you?" he said. "The answer is yes, you can. That's one of the most surprising things about this study."

Other findings in the report:

• Immigrants are more likely to be working than their native-born neighbors. The report found that 87% of immigrant households had at least one worker, compared to 76% for native households.

 

[church mouse guy]

The reason for migration is to institute global slavery.

 

[Wesley Briggman]

I suspect that many of these households have workers within them getting paid in cash as part of the underground economy. More law-breaking.

Immigrants are more likely to be working than their native-born neighbors. The report found that 87% of immigrant households had at least one worker, compared to 76% for native households.

As I noted in my previous post, illegal's are participating in the underground economy while collecting numerous welfare benefits. Many native-born freeloaders are doing the same thing.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

This same report said:

Camarota said one of the most shocking findings from the report was the high number of native-born Americans also on welfare. About 76% of immigrant households with children are on welfare, but so are 52% of native-born households with children.

"Most people have a sense that if you were to work for $10 an hour, 40 hours a week, you couldn't be receiving welfare, could you? You couldn't be living in public housing, could you?" he said. "The answer is yes, you can. That's one of the most surprising things about this study."

Other findings in the report:

• Immigrants are more likely to be working than their native-born neighbors. The report found that 87% of immigrant households had at least one worker, compared to 76% for native households.

Yes, and this is all the more reason to deport illegals and bar unneeded immigrants ASAP, to fine their governments for the funds they take, the costs of their arrests, litigations, and incarcerations, and to confiscate all they send out of the country.