swaimj said:
There must have been a time in Paul's life in which he did not know the law. This was probably when he was quite young. But, when he learned the law, and in the context he is speaking of the ten commandments generally and he specifies the law "thou shalt not covet", and begin to understand the reach of that command, he discovered that his heart was full of covetousness. In fact, knowing what covetousness was provoked him to more covetousness. That is why he says later that throug the knowledge of the law comes sin.
Yes, but let's also bring the passage to its stated conclusions.
1) Paul was not spiritually dead until the "law."
2) It was the "nature," not the "sin guilt" nor "original sin," that was latent (it was instinctive) in him. He sinned as a "natural man" in the natural course of life through, in this case, "covetousness" and then realized he was a sinner by nature. And now, having
chosen to sin, he is a sinner "at heart."
3) We are "lost" by hearing and comprehending the "law;" we are saved SIMILARLY by hearing and comprehending the "gospel." Both are free applications of "spiritual rules" to known facts. We are "born again" in heart then by
choosing salvation in Christ.
4) JD mentions the idea that "sin revived" means that Paul was already a sinner, just unaware of it. And truly, it is the by conviction of the Holy Spirit that we "see" that we have sinned.
However, I prefer to see it as the "seed of the serpent" reviving -- the seed that natural Adam caused to be "planted" in all of us through physical male descendancy. To say that we are "sinners from birth" is merely to say that we are born of natural seed --- vs. Jesus, who was born of supernatural seed.
This brings us to the necessity of being "born again" to supernatural seed ourselves, right?
skypair