• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

"all have sinned"

Status
Not open for further replies.

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
You don't understand. Webdog does not care if every Christian in the history of the world disagrees with him and points out how ludicrous his interpretations are. He does not care at all about Orthodoxy. He does not care about Systematic Theology.

All the work that Christians have done for the past 2,000 years is meaningless to him.

He is smarter than Augustine, Wycliff, Huss, Luther, Aquinas, Wesley, Calvin, Jacobus Arminius, Edwards, and the whole of Christianity put together. Who cares about the Council of Nicaea!!?? We have WEBDOG!! Who needs the stupid Council of Chalcedon!!?? WEBDOG is here!

It does not MATTER if the entire Orthodox faith opposes his viewpoints. What is that to him?

He is WEBDOG!!


He is such a man of the Scriptures that he needs no puny theologians or orthodox faith to hold him accountable! He believes the BIBLE whereas the rest of the Orthodox Faith and millions of Christians over thousands of years do not.

Thank heavens he has come to educate us all, all two thousand years of Christian history of us, in the BIBLE!
Trolling...
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
No. God said that we come forth from the womb telling lies. God said that in sin did our mothers conceive us.

That is what God said.

God said that ALL are sinners in need of a Savior. That is what God said.

What God says and what you say are diametrically opposed one to the other.

It is NOT a babies nature to run and jump. That is kind of silly, I think.


It is all human beings nature to sin.
Wow...it's amazing you heard a baby tell a lie from birth, actually just speaking from birth is amazing! What side show circus did this happen at? You have no clue how to discern literal from figurative language...

It's not in a babies nature to run and jump one day? That's silly? I suppose it's not in their nature to communicate either. How do these miraculous events occur if it's not in human nature, Luke? Is this some kind of mystery like your special dispensation of salvation? Maybe it's not even human nature to walk upright one day!
 

glfredrick

New Member
Wow...it's amazing you heard a baby tell a lie from birth, actually just speaking from birth is amazing! What side show circus did this happen at? You have no clue how to discern literal from figurative language...

It's not in a babies nature to run and jump one day? That's silly? I suppose it's not in their nature to communicate either. How do these miraculous events occur if it's not in human nature, Luke? Is this some kind of mystery like your special dispensation of salvation? Maybe it's not even human nature to walk upright one day!

We have definitively proven that your line of reasoning in this instance is not Scriptural. You claim Christ, do you also claim the Scriptures or do we need to start treating you as an infidel and unbeliever?

You can continue to argue this as a point of logic, or you can accept what the Word says. What is it?
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Webdog, can God not see all and speak to that truth in a universal way, or must God be a God of the open theist, who cannot see something until after it has happened? You are arguing for open theism here. I (and Paul) are arguing for a God who knows all and who can speak authoritatively on any given subject, past, present, and future.
I never once argued for open theism. The irony is you do not address the questions I pose to you, or when I show you how your "proof text" commentaries are anything but...but you sure enjoy erecting strawmen to tear down. I'm going to start calling you Handy Manny.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
We have definitively proven that your line of reasoning in this instance is not Scriptural. You claim Christ, do you also claim the Scriptures or do we need to start treating you as an infidel and unbeliever?

You can continue to argue this as a point of logic, or you can accept what the Word says. What is it?
Taking figurative language the way it is supposed to be taken is unscriptural? You have also heard a baby talk from the womb, and tell a lie? Reading the National Enquirer again?

Based on your un-christlike attitude...should we start doing the same with you? Actually, putting yourself on par with the Word is idolatry. That might be reason enough...
 

psalms109:31

Active Member
You have just expressed the Reformed doctrine with the exception of your handling of the Jews. No where does any Calvinist (save the hyper-Calvinist) EVER suggest that God forces anyone into belief. It just doesn't work that way. That is another un-truth that SO many people have been taught.


The most un-truth isn't what you want to believe, but the truth is God wants all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth. So man has any excuse not to come, just listen and learn from Jesus, the only one with that knowledge.

God choose people in the womb to prepare the way for Christ. I believe as you do before the cross, but after Jesus was lifted up all man can come. God has included with elect those who are meek and humble who trusted in the Lord those who heard the Gospel of their salvation having believed.

I was not chosen in the womb, but was included with believing Jews when I heard the Gospel of my salvation having believed.

Like I said they were the one's chosen before the foundation of the world the world, but those who were not able to enter was because of unbelief. I am a dog who begged at the master table
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
You don't understand. Webdog does not care if every Christian in the history of the world disagrees with him and points out how ludicrous his interpretations are. He does not care at all about Orthodoxy. He does not care about Systematic Theology.

All the work that Christians have done for the past 2,000 years is meaningless to him.

He is smarter than Augustine, Wycliff, Huss, Luther, Aquinas, Wesley, Calvin, Jacobus Arminius, Edwards, and the whole of Christianity put together. Who cares about the Council of Nicaea!!?? We have WEBDOG!! Who needs the stupid Council of Chalcedon!!?? WEBDOG is here!

It does not MATTER if the entire Orthodox faith opposes his viewpoints. What is that to him?

He is WEBDOG!!


He is such a man of the Scriptures that he needs no puny theologians or orthodox faith to hold him accountable! He believes the BIBLE whereas the rest of the Orthodox Faith and millions of Christians over thousands of years do not.

Thank heavens he has come to educate us all, all two thousand years of Christian history of us, in the BIBLE!

Uncalled for Luke....Uncalled for
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Wow...it's amazing you heard a baby tell a lie from birth, actually just speaking from birth is amazing! What side show circus did this happen at? You have no clue how to discern literal from figurative language...

It's not in a babies nature to run and jump one day? That's silly? I suppose it's not in their nature to communicate either. How do these miraculous events occur if it's not in human nature, Luke? Is this some kind of mystery like your special dispensation of salvation? Maybe it's not even human nature to walk upright one day!

No, WEBDOG, it is not a baby's nature to run and jump. It is a kid's nature to run and jump.

It is not a tadpole's nature to hop and eat flies- it is a frog's. Adding "one day" is ignorant. It either IS or IS NOT right NOW. Saying something is ONE DAY is ignorant.

What a ridiculous anecdote- almost as poor as your "shower and towel" anecdote.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
No, WEBDOG, it is not a baby's nature to run and jump. It is a kid's nature to run and jump.
Do you know what DNA is? What is encoded into it?

You do realize what you are saying here, right? If it's not in a baby's nature to run and jump, since they cannot commit sin (you even admitted as such) they must not have a sin nature! More Luke "consistent inconsistency".
It is not a tadpole's nature to hop and eat flies- it is a frog's. Adding "one day" is ignorant. It either IS or IS NOT right NOW. Saying something is ONE DAY is ignorant.
It is programmed into their DNA to do just that, even as a tadpole. In your zeal to always disagree, you make these kind of statements that make no sense. Human nature is defined as "the qualities and traits common to humanity". You would have an adult and an infant as both not being humans using your rationale. You would fit in well with Planned Parenthood.
What a ridiculous anecdote- almost as poor as your "shower and towel" anecdote.
...or as good as your "Jack and Jill" one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Luke2427

Active Member
Do you know what DNA is? What is encoded into it?

You do realize what you are saying here, right? If it's not in a baby's nature to run and jump, since they cannot commit sin (you even admitted as such) they must not have a sin nature! More Luke "consistent inconsistency".
It is programmed into their DNA to do just that, even as a tadpole. In your zeal to always disagree, you make these kind of statements that make no sense. Human nature is defined as "the qualities and traits common to humanity". You would have an adult and an infant as both not being humans using your rationale. You would fit in well with Planned Parenthood.
...or as good as your "Jack and Jill" one.

DNA has nothing to do with nature, genius.

Sin is not in our DNA.

You keep digging a deeper hole into ignorance the more you debate.

The only way you could say less is to keep talking.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
How did I not know that commentary such as that was on its way.

It must be because I am a Calvinist...:rolleyes:

Because you sure wouldn't expect anything negative to ever come from the mouth of any one else- that's for dang sure.

No, anytime a non-reformed opens his mouth, no matter how ridiculous his comments, you respond with a deluge of thumb ups and words like "EXCELLENT THOUGHTS!!"

I suppose that if a a non-reformed were to support Mormonism in opposition to Calvinism you would shower them with praise.

The fact of the matter is you trot around here on your high horse reprimanding Calvinists left and right and do nothing but spur on the insolence of ANYONE who is not a Calvinist.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Winman

Active Member
It is obvious that Psalms 58:3 is figurative and should not be taken literally, or used to form doctrine.

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.
4 Their poison is like the poison of a serpent: they are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear;

1) This verse does not say all men are estranged from the womb, it says "The wicked"

2) It says they go "astray" as soon as they be born. Astray from what? This is similar to Isa 53:6 that says all men have gone astray.

Isa 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.

If we like sheep have gone astray, then at one time we must have been in the flock. You can't go astray if you were not in the flock at one time.

This argues that men are not born lost, but soon after go astray in sin and are lost. It is true that all men will do this.

3) It is obvious hyperbole that it says the wicked are born speaking lies, infants do not have the ability to speak.

4) If you accept verse 3 as literal, you would need to accept verse 4 as well. Are children born poisonous like a serpent? Breast feeding could be very dangerous for the mother if this were so.

So, these verses are obvious exaggeration and should not be the foundation of doctrine.
 

Amy.G

New Member
It must be because I am a Calvinist...:rolleyes:
No. It's because you are rude and arrogant and do not display the fruits of the Spirit.

We have a Calvinist on the BB named Tom Butler who is always full of grace and is very liked around here. You should imitate him.
 

Luke2427

Active Member
No. It's because you are rude and arrogant and do not display the fruits of the Spirit.

We have a Calvinist on the BB named Tom Butler who is always full of grace and is very liked around here. You should imitate him.

Tom is a fine fella, I grant you. But he has more patience with ignorance and arrogance than I do.

Tom is smart enough, though, to recognize the sheer arrogance and ignorance of ANYBODY who thinks they can just outright ignore 2,000 years of church history and proclaim haphazardly these silly new doctrines. Tom knows it is arrogant and ignorant, I venture, he is just kind enough to tolerate it and go on without combating it. I am not.
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
It must be because I am a Calvinist...:rolleyes:

Because you sure wouldn't expect anything negative to ever come from the mouth of any one else- that's for dang sure.

No, anytime a non-reformed opens his mouth, no matter how ridiculous his comments, you respond with a deluge of thumb ups and words like "EXCELLENT THOUGHTS!!"

I suppose that if a a non-reformed were to support Mormonism in opposition to Calvinism you would shower them with praise.

The fact of the matter is you trot around here on your high horse reprimanding Calvinists left and right and do nothing but spur on the insolence of ANYONE who is not a Calvinist.

:tear::tear::tear:

I no longer ride horses Luke. I have Calvinist friends many of them, it is the ones who thrive on being obnoxious that I tend to grate on. You are in that crowd. And yes, I have "biases" dont we all, even you master Luke? Rarely do I come anywhere near being the "know it all" that you want everyone to think you are.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Tom is a fine fella, I grant you. But he has more patience with ignorance and arrogance than I do.

Tom is smart enough, though, to recognize the sheer arrogance and ignorance of ANYBODY who thinks they can just outright ignore 2,000 years of church history and proclaim haphazardly these silly new doctrines. Tom knows it is arrogant and ignorant, I venture, he is just kind enough to tolerate it and go on without combating it. I am not.
Perhaps the name-calling should stop. By name-calling I mean "arrogant and ignorant" etc.
But I will add, it is the height of arrogance to for you to say that it is your beliefs or even Calvin's beliefs that were the accepted beliefs for 2,000 years of church history. They were accepted by Calvinists, of course. But those aren't the only Christians that exist on the face of the earth.

Now please return to the OP and post with civility.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top